Hi folks,
One question: why brand:wikipedia and not wikipedia:brand?
Should we now use brand:ref, en:name, maxspeed:source instead of the regular
order?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52002801
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52529386
etc.
Ilya
___
Hi,
"> How do I tag two different historical churches with the same name, but
not the same identity, that are located a few miles apart?
different objects in OSM, same name tag. There’s no problem, besides maybe
other mappers thinking there is something fishy
"
"> Would adding "established " a
I like
brand
brand:wikidata
brand:wikipedia
When sorted alphabetically it's easy to compare them visually that way.
Same goes for
name
name:etymology:wikidata
and the others.
Polyglot
2017-10-02 10:41 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev :
> Hi folks,
>
> One question: why brand:wikipedia and not wikipedi
2017-10-02 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jo :
> I like
>
> brand
> brand:wikidata
> brand:wikipedia
>
> When sorted alphabetically it's easy to compare them visually that way.
>
that's also how it is done:
206 881 brand
11 886 brand:wikidata
6 610 brand:wikipedia
Cheers,
Martin
_
Hi,
while I was looking up some tags for camp sites, I just stumbled across
the proposal of motorcycle_friendly=* and the tags motorcycle:*=*. The
proposal was discussed on this mailing list in March 2017.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031403.html
I hereby propose t
2017-10-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert :
>
>
> What are your opinions?
I agree that features which have been rejected in proposal voting should
not get a feature definition page, at least not if they are disputed and
not used in significant numbers (there will still be the proposal page t
Sorting tags should not be an argument in this. You can sort by any letter you
like. I'd prefer to have all wikipedia links grouped, not all brand-related
links.
Also, would you retag all "ref:brand" to "brand:ref"? All "source:geometry" to
"geometry:source"?
Also, I've got a taginfo database
Hello,
Le 02. 10. 17 à 10:41, Ilya Zverev a écrit :
> why brand:wikipedia and not wikipedia:brand?
brand:wikipedia: the wikipedia is related to the brand.
it is the wikipedia link about the brand,
so brand:wikipedia is the right order.
the same as with name:en : the english version of the name.
Hello,
Le 02. 10. 17 à 13:21, Michael Reichert a écrit :
> What are your opinions?
I totally adhere to the many problems you point out.
Regards,
Marc
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 02-Oct-17 10:21 PM, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
while I was looking up some tags for camp sites, I just stumbled across
the proposal of motorcycle_friendly=* and the tags motorcycle:*=*. The
proposal was discussed on this mailing list in March 2017.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/t
10 matches
Mail list logo