Sorting tags should not be an argument in this. You can sort by any letter you like. I'd prefer to have all wikipedia links grouped, not all brand-related links.
Also, would you retag all "ref:brand" to "brand:ref"? All "source:geometry" to "geometry:source"? Also, I've got a taginfo database from 20.04.2017 and it has only 694 brand:wikidata and 51 brand:wikipedia tags. We had a mass retagging last week, hence these big numbers. I am arguing we should do another mass retagging, to the proper way of naming. Ilya Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2017-10-02 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>: > I like > > > > brand > > brand:wikidata > > brand:wikipedia > > > > When sorted alphabetically it's easy to compare them visually that way. > > > that's also how it is done: 206 881 brand 11 886 brand:wikidata 6 610 > brand:wikipedia _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
