Hi everyone,
After a proposal about waterways classification by Daniel Koć, I decided to
make an alternative one. To me, using subjective values and criteria for
classifying rivers is a better way, since it can work in any country regardless
of the official classification. It could be adjusted
Thank you, David!
I tried to contact the user that made that change in the wiki page. As he
didn't answered, I reverted partially his edit.
2017-08-17 12:33 GMT-03:00 David Groom :
> -- Original Message --
> From: "wille"
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
> tagging@op
Ilya,
This seems to make sense as a way to help differentiate rivers. It is also
good because in will work with intermittent=yes.
I have a couple of comments: 1) When a mapper is looking at a river to
trace in a localized area they know the river is big or small only by
looking at the width of the
Ilya,
please don't use the word "subjective" for this. Subjective tagging has
no place in OSM because it is not verifiable; we don't want that and we
shouldn't let people think we do.
What you seem to propose does however not look "subjective" since you
are keying your suggested tags to the lengt
On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Ilya Zverev wrote:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rivers_Classifi
>cation
I originally thought i'd stay out of these discussions on importance
tags for rivers (because in the end i don't think there is anything to
be gained from it) but this
Christoph,
The Deva river is a great example, thanks.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rivers_Classifi
> >cation
>
> I originally thought i'd stay out of these
Hi,
IMHO, I would drop shop=boutique because it is one of the most confusing
tag, especially in French-speaking contexts.
Basically in French from France, boutique is a generic word meaning shop.
More than what it sells, it designates the place, generally not very large
("magasin" would then more
W dniu 29.08.2017 o 19:27, Severin Menard pisze:
IMHO, I would drop shop=boutique because it is one of the most
confusing tag, especially in French-speaking contexts.
Is it only in the Anglo-sphere that the word boutique means this or
also in other cultural contexts?
In Poland we use "butik"
Hi Severin
Thank you for that very detailed explanation! :-)
Looks like yet another time when the same word means different things in
different languages
Thanks
Graeme
On 30 August 2017 at 03:27, Severin Menard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO, I would drop shop=boutique because it is one of the most c
Hi Daniel
Thanks to you as well - what you've said backs Severin's comments up nicely
> In Poland we use "butik" as a clothes fashion shop, however I would also
> drop shop=boutique and shop=fashion.
>
>
> And how should a typical tagger know what market segment it really is?
>
Especially if
I have created a proposal for sorting things out with clothes and shoes
shops according to our discussions on this list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop%3Dclothes_subtags
--
"Probably it's an eternal problem - too many chiefs, too few Indians" [O.
Muzalyev]
__
I also agree with dropping shop=boutique and fashion.
2017-08-29 20:42 GMT-03:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> Hi Daniel
>
> Thanks to you as well - what you've said backs Severin's comments up nicely
>
>
>> In Poland we use "butik" as a clothes fashion shop, however I would also
>> drop shop=boutique a
>>
>> Especially if it's a man tagging women's clothing stores! :-)
>>
>> From these comments, I would agree with dropping both =boutique &
>> =fashion, leaving only shop=clothes, with type=men's / women's / children's
>> etc
>>
-1, there are shop that sell clothes and jewelry and accessoires besi
Does this mean that we will drop/change amenity=cafe as well ? Because
it is confusing in Dutch & French. A cafe is a place where they sell
beer, not ?
m.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Severin Menard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO, I would drop shop=boutique because it is one of the most confusing
>
On 30 August 2017 at 13:20, Marc Gemis wrote:
> A cafe is a place where they sell
> beer, not ?
>
Not in Australia, no!
> Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Yeah, but in Australia they do not use "boutique" to refer to any shop
neither. Still people think it should be removed for this reason.
Tagging is done in British-English, if the word used in the tagging
means something else in your language, too bad. You have to make sure
that the editors have a
what do we gain with those changes ?
Why should a shoe store be a sub tag of a clothes store ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> I have created a proposal for sorting things out with clothes and shoes
> shops according to our discussions on this list:
>
> https://wiki.openstree
You forgot to merge shop=jewelry with shop=clothes (*)
Maybe the next tags we can merge are shop=car, bicycle, truck,
motorcycle, car_repair, car_parts, tires.
After all they are all vehicle related. something like shop=vehicle;
vehicle:type=car; ... perhaps ?
Do we really want to merge shop=c
18 matches
Mail list logo
