Hi,
I put stops, give ways and traffic light where the car has to stop/yield which
can be far from the position of the sign (for instance in the US where the
light is after the junction, thus may not be crossed if you turn). Also on
narrow junction you may have the lights at the junction but th
2017-03-19 20:55 GMT+01:00 yo paseopor :
> but the way the node is in yes it does. Node it is not independent. It is
> in a way.
whether the node is independent or part of one or more ways depends on the
situation and mapper. Even if the node is now part of just one way, in the
future this migh
2017-03-19 20:55 GMT+01:00 yo paseopor :
> In OSM mappers assume something until this thing has become more important
> and then need to redefine the way the key is applied with subkeys and other
> values.Think about bus stops for example [2]
For bus stops, nothing has really changed in the pas
2017-03-19 20:55 GMT+01:00 yo paseopor :
> Why you accept a line and not a dot in the same place knowing the
> information of the way the node it is [5]?
because a line/way has a direction, a node hasn't. It is simple as that.
You can continue to insist in mapping directions on nodes, and it m
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Since nodes lack direction, but relations do... seems like a stop sign
> relation would be ideal, with multiple ways for the "from" role and the node
> where it applies as the "to" role, with the actual stop sign locations as
> the "device" ro
Since nodes lack direction, but relations do... seems like a stop sign
relation would be ideal, with multiple ways for the "from" role and the
node where it applies as the "to" role, with the actual stop sign locations
as the "device" role, similar to how enforcement is tagged.
On Mar 19, 2017 14:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Since nodes lack direction, but relations do... seems like a stop sign
> > relation would be ideal, with multiple ways for the "from" role and the
> node
> > where it applies as the "to"
traffic_signals:direction=* is used on 27278 highway=traffic_signals
objects:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=traffic_signals#combinations
highway=stop is combined with a direction tag on about 77000 objects
(direction=backward, direction=forward and the literal direction=*)
https:/
Given the effect of the stopping process on the overall travel time (mainly
for cars), we need a way that can be used by routing algorithms.
I am inserting them in quantity, but only in the simple way of a node on
the way. "My" stop signs apply to the nearest junction. This should in
principle allo
On a node, traffic_signals:direction=* applies only to the traffic
signals while direction=* applies to all other tags which may be
associated with a direction (camera...). This is the additional meaning.
Let say that traffic_signals:direction=* is a more explicit tag than
direction=* (see http
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> Given how widely used the direction tag is for highway=* signs, why
> isn't it also applied to highway=traffic_signals ? Does
> traffic_signals:direction=* bear additional meaning that direction=*
> does not convey ?
>
If there is a tr
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Topographe Fou
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put stops, give ways and traffic light where the car has to stop/yield
> which can be far from the position of the sign (for instance in the US
> where the light is after the junction, thus may not be crossed if you
> turn). Also
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> whether the node is independent or part of one or more ways depends on the
> situation and mapper. Even if the node is now part of just one way, in the
> future this might change and it can become member of more ways (e.g. if the
> wa
Hello,
most of you know that place with the green mermaid logo serving coffee.
But what is it's name/brand to be tagged in OSM?
There is a wiki page suggesting "Starbucks Coffee". No references listed
how it was decided to be. It also mentioned that "Starbucks" was more
common.
https://wiki.
On 03/20/2017 03:37 PM, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> most of you know that place with the green mermaid logo serving coffee.
>
> But what is it's name/brand to be tagged in OSM?
>
> There is a wiki page suggesting "Starbucks Coffee". No references listed
> how it was decided to be. It also mentioned t
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 5:42 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> I'm all for "Starbucks" in the same vein that we tag "Chipotle" not
> "Chipotle Mexican Grill".
+1
I am not sure how "brand" and "official_name" work into it, but usually the
store's name is not just "Starbucks coffee" - it usually has
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kenny
wrote:
>
> By contrast, traffic signs are inherently directional. Without a direction
> indication, we really have no way of conveying "traffic on the side
> street has to come to a stop/give way here; traffic on the main street
> can proceed relativel
I'm all for "Starbucks" in the same vein that we tag "Chipotle" not
"Chipotle Mexican Grill".
+1
No need for redundant information. "Chipotle" does the job as does
"Starbucks", however the Wiki says to use "Starbucks Coffee". I have never
used that longer name to refer to Starbucks nor have I hea
18 matches
Mail list logo
