sent from a phone
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 16:50, Thilo Haug wrote:
>
> Please check where this mail has been gone, reason :
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031403.html
maybe you haven't been subscribed with the email address from which it was sent
by the time it w
Europe has numerous international cycle routes signposted and marketed
as 'EuroVelo', and these are often mapped in OSM:
http://www.eurovelo.com/
Unfortunately the tagging is pretty inconsistent, especially when routes
are shared with national/regional (NCN/RCN) routes, as is usually t
As EV routes are not managed as single entities, every route is split in
pieces managed on a country basis. I know the situation in Italy, as I am
involved in regional and national cycle routes here. EV routes are handled
by BicItalia which is part of FIAB, the "Italian Federation of Friends of
the
Hi Christian,
"Christian Müller" schrieb:
> I'm sure there is a lot of stuff in OSM where you could
> trade code against a relation. But most of the time it
> introduces dependencies: on caching [...]
you're probably more than 10 years late with that and there had
been many to suggest great new
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 05. März 2017 um 20:22 Uhr
> Von: "Peter Barth"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
>
> you're probably more than 10 years late with that and there had
> been many to suggest great new database schemata, gr
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 05. März 2017 um 20:22 Uhr
> Von: "Peter Barth"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> Mappers even screw up simple multipolygons all the time.
Addendum: It's not mappers to blame, but partial data, i.e. ob
sent from a phone
> On 5 Mar 2017, at 21:11, Christian Müller wrote:
>
> Strictly speaking, even a simple way is just that:
> A relation of points.
+1
it's the technical, abstract way in which relations are mostly presented to the
mappers, that scares many of them, if this gets abstracted a
I have a route that is
mountain bike and
hiking and
horse
the route=mtb;hiking;horse functions .. at least for hiking and horse
..(but not mtb on
https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=6!-35.8356!149.48 - change it to
horse or hiking to see mapped sections of the BNT)
the network tag .. I ha
Maybe its time someone put a note on the proposal page saying that the
author is posting to the list but does not appear to be receiving
messages from it ?
In case its a language issue, could that message be in German and
English perhaps ?
David
On 06/03/17 05:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote
Hi David,
Am 05.03.2017 um 23:46 schrieb David Bannon:
> Maybe its time someone put a note on the proposal page saying that the
> author is posting to the list but does not appear to be receiving
> messages from it ?
>
> In case its a language issue, could that message be in German and
> English
It ought to be possible to use hierarchy in those relations. That way you
would map them at the national level and group them for the international
level.
Same for that route that is mtb/hiking/horse. 1 route containing the ways,
then reuse for the other 2. At the moment I would tag that one with
There was an automatic reply, saying :
"Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
[...]
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator's decision."
But that doesn't mean to me the whole mail was "invalid" or won't reach
t
It is possible that the moderator has a backlog of messages, and hasn't
reviewed it yet.
On March 5, 2017 5:02:26 PM Thilo Haug wrote:
There was an automatic reply, saying :
"Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
[...]
Either the message will get posted to the l
That's how it looks like,
but the email should also inform about this possibility.
There should be either a text that it's necessary to resend it when
subscribed to the list
or a possibility (link) to check whether it meanwhile arrived.
Am 06.03.2017 um 00:08 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
>
> It is
"Process problems are a pain in the ass. You never, ever want to have
process problems ...
That's when people start getting really angry at each other."
Linus Torvalds
Am 06.03.2017 um 00:08 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
>
> It is possible that the moderator has a backlog of messages, and
> hasn't re
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion about the mapping of time zones.
There are currently 80 relations in OSM tagged as boundary=timezone
using between them over 10,000 ways.
I think that mapping these time zones as geometries has several issues:
1. It introduces yet another un-observable
When I get that message (and I hope I have overcome the issue.. at least
for now) it is because I sent the message from a non OSM registered
email address.
I simply go to the web address and cancel that email .. and then repost
from the my correct OSM email address ...
that should mean less work
I generally agree with your view.
The wiki [1] already says: "An effective way to tag timezone information
is to add it to administration boundaries of countries or in the case of
larger countries smaller administrative boundaries such as states and
territories. (Do not create stand-alone boun
18 matches
Mail list logo
