I have just started mapping according to the simple building scheme and
have some questions to the more experienced mappers:
A situation I meet very often are buildings consisting in several parts,
e.g. often there are higher parts on the (flat) roof that are smaller than
the rest.
1. Which repre
I usually go for a mixture of 1.1. and 1.3., i.e.
- use building:part for the architectural blocks the building is made of,
with building:min_height / building:min_level where appropiate
- use type=multipolygon building=*, stuff the usual building tags into that,
this will be rendered by
Also note that there are some implications in 2d mapnik rendering.
With the building outline we define and the mapnik rules that were
set upto render everything highway=* _above_ anything else, the
renderer _will_ overlap a building outline with a pedestrian area.
Esp. when (highway=pedestrian ar
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 14:09 Uhr
> Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> I have just started mapping according to the simple building scheme
> and have some questions to the more experi
Thank you for the extensive answer. Here are some comments:
2017-03-02 15:24 GMT+01:00 "Christian Müller" :
> I usually go for a mixture of 1.1. and 1.3., i.e.
>
> - use building:part for the architectural blocks the building is made of,
> with building:min_height / building:min_level where appr
Hi,
I have been informed by another mapper who uses XING (the German
LikedIn) that there is a new tag motorcycle_friendly=yes. [1]
Its wiki page says that the key has been proposed and accepted.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcycle_friendly
The proposal page can be found here:
https
Hi Michael,
On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote:
Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to
- remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page
- reset the status of the proposal to "RFC"
- to declare the voting as invalid by adding a note at the top of t
+1 on highway=construction + construction=* + access is no if non-accessible
If accessible (such as
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=delta%2C%20be#map=18/50.81538/4.40527&layers=N
/
https://www.google.nl/maps/place/P%2BR+Delta/@50.8154748,4.4032357,261m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c3d
On 03-Mar-17 06:55 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 02.03.2017 20:21, Michael Reichert wrote:
Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to
- remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page
- reset the status of the proposal to "RFC"
- to declare the voting
sent from a phone
> On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>
> While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not
> announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious
> to me that the vote is invalid and needs to be repeated.
+1
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 17:19 Uhr
> Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer"
> An: "Christian Müller"
> Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> do I understand you correctly, we use 1 way (or multipolygon) for every
> building:
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
>
> +1 on highway=construction + construction=* + access is no if non-accessible
> If accessible (such as
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=delta%2C%20be#map=18/50.81538/4.40527&layers=N
> /
> https://www.google.nl/maps/place/P%2BR+
I'm hijacking the thread a bit here, but the discussion of "bridge
buildings" in Martin's message made me think of this:
On the campus of GE Research in Niskayuna, New York, there's a fairly
substantial building that is on a bridge across a ravine.
>From the way it renders, I think that I've prob
On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote:
While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like not
announcing the vote do clearly have a big impact on the outcome. It's obvious to me that
the vote is
14 matches
Mail list logo
