> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 17:19 Uhr > Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > An: "Christian Müller" <cmu...@gmx.de> > Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings > > do I understand you correctly, we use 1 way (or multipolygon) for every > building:part plus 1 multipolygon relation with building=* as a [legacy] > plus 1 type=building relation for every single building? That's a lot of > stuff, but it sounds reasonable in order to map everything in an > unambiguous way.
Yes, but you only need to do it for buildings with more than one part. For non-complex buildings 1 MP relation holding all tags may suffice. (or even a single closed way, if none of its segments ought to take part in definition of adjacent areas) There are a lot of aspects of the simple building model with room for improvement. Among them the most important: documentation in the wiki. It looks unfinished and could benefit a lot from additional examples. Cheers _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
