Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine and vending=public_transport_plans?

2017-03-01 Thread John Willis
On Feb 18, 2017, at 5:39 PM, David Bannon wrote: >>> detail, as this is quite volatile data, and there are often lots of >>> different options > > Yes, I strongly agree Martin. A far better approach would be to include a > link to an authoritative source. +1 I think mapping the vending mac

Re: [Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

2017-03-01 Thread Volker Schmidt
The original example https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en-US is now a set of ways that can be used as non-freeway highways. I would most likely tag them as either service or track with surface and tracktype tags. Important to check on the ground the access ri

Re: [Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

2017-03-01 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/1/17 6:54 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > The original example > https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en-US > > is now a set of ways that can be used as non-freeway highways.

Re: [Tagging] Mapping freeway stub ends?

2017-03-01 Thread John F. Eldredge
The instance I was speaking of is Briley Parkway, a ring road through the outer portion of Nashville, TN. It is an odd mix, with portions implemented as a limited-access freeway, and other portions as ordinary city streets. Some parts were purpise-built, other parts involved connectinng existi