sent from a phone
> On 25 Feb 2017, at 21:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> I tend to favor highway=construction, construction=* and possibly
> abandoned=yes if it's partially built and could be finished later, but it's
> left in-situ
+1, I'd keep construction until the road is opened to the pub
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 11:33 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> I would imagine that is quite common in large towns and cities.
Yea - all the main sorting facilities I know of - 2 in the US and 3 in Japan
are HUGE buildings with many employees routing mail for hundreds of thousands
or millions of p
That's interesting. I wonder if the tagging of tourism=attraction is
totally appropriate but surely a waterway=source tag is. Presumably the
mapper was trying to indicate that the source of that stream is where that
node is.
I'm going to start using the tag myself and let data consumers figure it
... I have seen examples of stubs being constructed, end up as a ghost road
for the next 3 or 4 decades, then suddenly are a thing that exists. I 5
opened in 1963 without ramps to I 84 east initially, but stubs existed.
Yes we had a similar ghost exit on I-93 above Charles town/Somerville just
n
how about extending the waterway relation with a member role which can
indicate either the "spring" or the "source" in case of a "creation" of
a river by multiple tributary rivers?
Not sure how it would best be called. Source? Origin? Confluence? Is
there a specific hdyrology term for this?
Stephan's reference to Wikipedia helps to properly define source in
this context :
Wikipedia: confluence: In geography, a confluence is the meeting of two or
more bodies of water. Also known as a conflux, it refers either to the
point where a tributary joins a larger river, (main stem), or *where
