sent from a phone
> On 17 Feb 2017, at 10:28, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a 'ticket' could be 'single use, with the option of a return journey, for a
> set distance or place'.
> a 'card' could be 'multiple use, no set time or distance, limited by the
> amount on the card'?
> a 'p
On 18/02/17 18:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
...a 'ticket' could be 'single use, with the option of a return journey, for a
set distance or place'.
...a 'card' could be 'multiple use, no set time or distance, limited by the
amount on the card'?
...a 'pass' could be for a planned trip over a se
sent from a phone
> On 17 Feb 2017, at 21:40, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dictionary motor car: a vehicle, especially one for passengers, carrying its
> own power generating and propelling mechanism for travel on ordinary roads
Isn't this a motorbike or a bus ;-) ? Does it inclu
>
> Laundromat:foobar=n scheme.
>
> Laundromat:10kg_dryer=8
> Laundromat:20kg_dryer=2
> Laundromat:10kg_sidewasher=3
> Laundromat:20kg_sidewasher=1
> Laundromat:shoe_washer=1
> Laundromat:shoe_dryer=1
>
I'm not so sure that tagging minutiae like this is appropriate for OSM,
which is really a geo-
I've always used
lanes=5
centre_turn_lane=yes
as a shortcut that implies
lanes=5
lanes:forward=2
lanes:both_ways=1
lanes:backward=2
turn:lanes:both_ways=left
It's just a way to reduce five tags to two in a common, special-case situation.
Lanes can be any odd number greater than one.
I don't see anything wrong with the hierarchy. It was mentioned that there are
signs in Germany that forbid motorcars to pass. Are you sure that these signs
aren't prohibiting all vehicles from passing? This may be the case even if
there's a picture of a car on the sign.
The motorcar key is
On 19-Feb-17 03:11 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
I'm not so sure that tagging minutiae like this is appropriate for
OSM, which is really a geo-database and not a business/services
directory. This is like tagging Italian restaurants with something
like the following (which I hope nobody thi
I'm not so sure that tagging minutiae like this is appropriate for OSM,
which is really a geo-database and not a business/services directory. This
is like tagging Italian restaurants with something like the following
(which I hope nobody thinks is a good idea):
+1
Regardless of the "intent" of OSM
sent from a phone
> On 18 Feb 2017, at 22:36, Tristan Anderson
> wrote:
>
> I don't see anything wrong with the hierarchy. It was mentioned that there
> are signs in Germany that forbid motorcars to pass. Are you sure that these
> signs aren't prohibiting all vehicles from passing? This
I think I see what the problem is and correct me if I'm wrong. Under the
current tagging scheme the only way to tag a road that prohibits Kraftwagen
would be something like...
bus=no
goods=no
hgv=no
moped=yes
motorcar=no
motorcycle=yes
...and probably several others
Even though this s
On 19-Feb-17 02:24 PM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
I think I see what the problem is and correct me if I'm wrong. Under
the current tagging scheme the only way to tag a road that prohibits
Kraftwagen would be something like...
bus=no
goods=no
hgv=no
moped=yes
motorcar=no
motorcycle=yes
11 matches
Mail list logo
