sent from a phone
> Am 07.01.2016 um 17:14 schrieb Aaron Spaulding :
>
> Either of these models can be used. I think option 1 makes the most sense,
> but I’d like to know what the community consensus is.
I've always thought of ele representing the lower part, which is clear for man
made fea
On Thursday 07 January 2016, Aaron Spaulding wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve been working on generating 3D meshes based on OSM data and I ran
> into a problem. Vertical features like 'natural=cliff',
> 'barrier=retaining_wall’ and 'waterway=waterfall' occupy two points
> in physical space, but because of
On 8/01/2016 3:32 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Thursday 07 January 2016, Aaron Spaulding wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve been working on generating 3D meshes based on OSM data and I ran
into a problem. Vertical features like 'natural=cliff',
'barrier=retaining_wall’ and 'waterway=waterfall' occupy two p
I am editing in Colorado, US in a rural part of the state. I do have first
hand knowledge of the area. It looks like someone has gone through and
changed many ways tagged "highway = residential" to "highway = track." For
example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6152252#map=16/40.7825/-105.1985
My parents house is in a pretty rural part of Arizona and distinguishing
between tracks and driveways or even residential roads can be difficult there.
So my initial instinct was to say leave the ways in that part of Colorado as
tracks as it can be hard to tell on the imagery.
But looking at th
Cliffs are never truly vertical. A bird's eye view from above will show that.
If they are steep enough they could be modelled as a line, but in general we
should allow for a polygon, with a high side and a low side.
On 7 January 2016 17:32:49 CET, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>sent from a p
Nobody will be using the raw data to fly a plane. It doesn't matter if we use
the ele tag for the top or the bottom - as long as the height is given, the
other value can easily be derived. What is important is consistency, both in
its definition and it's usage. Defining it as sometimes the top a
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Cliffs are never truly vertical. A bird's eye view from above will show
> that. If they are steep enough they could be modelled as a line, but in
> general we should allow for a polygon, with a high side and a low side.
>
Actually, sometimes th
Indeed.
On 7 January 2016 23:57:40 CET, Mike Thompson wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Colin Smale
>wrote:
>
>> Cliffs are never truly vertical. A bird's eye view from above will
>show
>> that. If they are steep enough they could be modelled as a line, but
>in
>> general we should allow f
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:15:00 -0700
Mike Thompson wrote:
> I am editing in Colorado, US in a rural part of the state. I do have
> first hand knowledge of the area. It looks like someone has gone
> through and changed many ways tagged "highway = residential" to
> "highway = track." For example:
>
This is something we go round and round with in Thailand as well.
Highway=track is usually but not always a smaller, narrower way, either
paved or unpaved, that is used for agricultural or other purposes. It is
not a connector link between towns nor does it normally have residences
alongside of it.
On 8/01/2016 9:56 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
Nobody will be using the raw data to fly a plane. It doesn't matter if
we use the ele tag for the top or the bottom - as long as the height
is given, the other value can easily be derived. What is important is
consistency, both in its definition and it's
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Grasping at straws .. the elevation of a mountain is given as its peak. If
> there is consistency within the map then the elevation of all objects
> should be their maximum height.
>
Sort of. By convention (in general mappin
Javbw
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> hat is used for agricultural or other purposes
Question on that:
https://goo.gl/maps/Nvbmz1Z4bJp
We have a lot of public roads in Japan that, on import, were set to
"unclassified". In rural areas - many are wrong.
But as the r
14 matches
Mail list logo
