Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 18.10.2015 um 02:28 schrieb John Eldredge : > > I find shop=trade too generic to be useful, as there are many different > trades besides the building-construction trades. +1, cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Taggin

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On Oct 18, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > >> Am 18.10.2015 um 02:28 schrieb John Eldredge : >> >> I find shop=trade too generic to be useful, as there are many different >> trades besides the building-construction trades. > > > +1, > +1 It seems to follow

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread ael
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:28:39PM -0500, John Eldredge wrote: > I find shop=trade too generic to be useful, as there are many different > trades besides the building-construction trades. Where does that constraint come from? You can have the subtag trade take pretty well any relevant value. Build

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 18 October 2015 at 12:55, ael wrote: > But really it was invented as a way to tag clear groups of places that > had no obvious existing tags Do you have a source for that? (Not questioning you, just curious to read the original discussion.) -- Matthijs ___

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:59:28PM +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 18 October 2015 at 12:55, ael wrote: > > But really it was invented as a way to tag clear groups of places that > > had no obvious existing tags > > Do you have a source for that? (Not questioning you, just curious to > read

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread Philip Barnes
Trade is more an access tag, you can have a shop=motor_spares for example. Some are open to the public, others are exclusively to sell to other businesses and will refuse access to normal people. The same is true for some shop=diy, others such as B&Q whilst open to all do have a separate trade entr

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote: > Trade is more an access tag, you can have a shop=motor_spares for > example. Some are open to the public, others are exclusively to sell to > other businesses and will refuse access to normal people. The same is > true for some shop=d

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:59:28PM +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 18 October 2015 at 12:55, ael wrote: > > But really it was invented as a way to tag clear groups of places that > > had no obvious existing tags > > Do you have a source for that? (Not questioning you, just curious to > read

Re: [Tagging] post_box:type values, meter in particular

2015-10-18 Thread Holger Mappt
On 2015-10-16 at 03:16 +0200 Craig Wallace wrote: On 2015-10-15 20:54, Holger Mappt wrote: The post_box:type Wiki page [1] was created two months ago and the key was added to the JOSM preset recently [2]. That means that the values show up in Launchpad for translation. The "meter" type in parti

Re: [Tagging] Shop values review

2015-10-18 Thread John Willis
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: > > Trade is more an access tag, you can have a shop=motor_spares for > example. Some are open to the public, Is that really implied in the trade tag? I understand if you need a license or certification to buy parts - but a shop is still

Re: [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

2015-10-18 Thread Hubert
Hey Paul, I couldn’t find a problem with JOSM (Validator and „Lanes and Road Attributes“) or OsmAnd (rendering and routing bicycles and cars) on this [1] section of road where I have mapped “lanes=2” and “bicycle:lanes” with a “lane” count of 4, due to a weird bus stop. (bicycle:lanes=use_sidepath