On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:20:10 -0700
Paul Norman wrote:
> On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> > That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not
> > disused=yes" into every cartocss rule!
>
> Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as
> we will not be
> On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So ALL shops should all be together under shops= (even though all shops are
> in fact amenities too). Same for offices.
> This reduces the amenity= values to those that are not offices nor shops.
I think the easiest way to
What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing existing
tags not only about new tags)? Where takes a vote place about this?
Best
Serpens
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. August 2015 um 14:21 Uhr
> Von: serpen
Take a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
--K
On 26 August 2015 at 13:10, wrote:
> What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
> Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing
> existing tags not only about new tags)?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Chris Hill wrote:
> On 24/08/15 18:56, François Lacombe wrote:
> >Hi Mateusz,
> >
> >It seems this tag is a combination of waterway=canal and disused=yes.
> >
> >I'm not so in favor of such value (derelict_canal). There are two
> >different information in o
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:23:10PM +1000, Warin wrote:
> On 26/08/2015 8:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> >On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> >>That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not disused=yes"
> >>into every cartocss rule!
> >
> >Fortunately, we will not have to do that
On 24/08/2015 21:49, Chris Hill wrote:
On 24/08/15 18:56, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
It seems this tag is a combination of waterway=canal and disused=yes.
I'm not so in favor of such value (derelict_canal). There are two
different information in one value.
I think that 'disused=yes
On 26/08/2015, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:23:10PM +1000, Warin wrote:
>> On 26/08/2015 8:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> >On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> >>That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not disused=yes"
>> >>into every cartocss rule!
>> >
>> >Fo
Wednesday 26 August 2015 12:51:22, Dave F.:
> Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
> additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
> you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
> set. If programmers "don't notice" the
On 26/08/2015 12:51, Dave F. wrote:
Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
set. If programmers "don't notice" then, quite simp
Wednesday 26 August 2015 21:04:47, Andrew Errington:
> Curiously, the disadvantages of "disused=yes" seem rather contrived,
> and not really likely, whereas the disadvantages of "disused:*=*" seem
> quite genuine. Not to mention that "disused=yes" is simpler, and very
> obvious to a human reader.
On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not
disused=yes" into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as we
will not be supporting the style of tagg
On 26/08/2015 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not
disused=yes" into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as
we wil
On 26/08/2015 13:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 26/08/2015 12:51, Dave F. wrote:
Sub tags such as disused=yes have always been the way to describe
additional attributes of an entity. It's even the syntax used by XML:
you collect all 'waterway=canal' items then manipulate that selection
set. If
On 26/08/15 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
A pub that's closed down it's still recognisable as a pub. It's not a
park bench or a multi-storey car park. It's just closed. This should
be described in sub tags.
No, a pub that is closed is simply not open for business until it
reopens the next day. A pu
On 8/26/15 8:55 AM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 26/08/2015 13:44, Dave F. wrote:
>> On 25/08/2015 23:20, Paul Norman wrote:
>>> On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing "... and not
disused=yes" into every cartocss rule!
>>>
>>> Fortunately,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> To leave a tag that describes it as a pub (when it is not) then add
> another tag that says it is not a pub is plain daft.
>
+1
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openst
On 25/08/2015 10:21 PM, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote:
Example (Spanish consulate in France – MY PROPOSAL):
amenity=diplomatic <--- it’s a diplomatic institution
diplomatic:type=consulate <--- more specififc: it’s a consulate
diplomatic:sending=ES <--- machine-readable ISO 31
18 matches
Mail list logo
