Re: [Tagging] landcover=trees definition

sent from a phone > Am 16.08.2015 um 01:41 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann : > > That depends on observation time. E.g. much of Europe is covered by fog in > Autumn. So this will be landcover=fog. I'm not very good at refraining from replying to trolls, but I think this time I have to do it...

Re: [Tagging] landcover=trees definition

On 16.08.2015 09:06, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I'm not very good at refraining from replying to trolls, but I think this > time I have to do it... This is not the first time you refrain from replying when it comes to a definition of your landcover=* key. You simply have not managed to make up

Re: [Tagging] Shop= values and a sub key for detail?

sent from a phone > Am 14.08.2015 um 01:46 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > In this way shop= values don't have to carry all the detail leading to > possibly millions of values. > Rather shop= values can be a collective value without the specific detail, > making them easier to dist

Re: [Tagging] Shop= values and a sub key for detail?

sent from a phone > Am 14.08.2015 um 02:02 schrieb Ruben Maes : > > vending comes to mind, it is defined as being for vending machines. > > In any case, you should use semi-colons to separate multiple values. I've in rare occasions used: "sells" http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sell

Re: [Tagging] landcover=trees definition

On 16.08.2015 04:00, Daniel Koć wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover There is no definition of the landcover=* key. The page features a wide range of keys including amenity=* and tourism=*. Even if there were a definition, it would be the wrong place. The definition belongs to th

[Tagging] Cycle route relations, networks and refs

I've encountered two fairly widespread issues with bike route tagging and would appreciate help sorting them out. In parts of Germany and elsewhere, networks of local/regional cycle routes are grouped into regions. The Nordrhein-Westfalen network is a good example. The master relation

Re: [Tagging] Cycle route relations, networks and refs

A few years ago I spent a lot of time breaking up these kinds of relations in The Netherlands, after fixing the ones in Belgium. I can assure you it's indeed a lot of work. When numbered walking route relations came in vogue, I made sure they were mapped properly right from the start. I tackled a

Re: [Tagging] Cycle route relations, networks and refs

The definition of the cycle network you to complain about can be found in http://www.radverkehrsnetz.nrw.de/RVN_home01.html. You can't break it into routes, it is a network. And ref=NRW is not so bad, the complete name would be ref="Radverkehrs

Re: [Tagging] landcover=trees definition

> On Aug 16, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > > Not everything is "use". E.h. hazard=* is rather the opposite of use. Most > natural=* features denote what's there, not how it is used. Well, you *can* > use a swamp, but if you don't use it, it is a swamp anyway, so this is > really

Re: [Tagging] Rue réservée aux jeux - play street

Unfortunately, time required to render such tiles, and the caching of tiles, means that many users would likely not see the map representation of short-term events until the event was over. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. H

[Tagging] Tagging National Forests

Hi, The new rendering of forests broke cases where a lake is inside a forest and the lake is not mapped as an inner section of the surrounding forest polygon. I posted this issue in the carto issue tracker: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1754 But after some discussio