Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread phil
On Sat May 9 02:10:38 2015 GMT+0100, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Matthijs Melissen > wrote: > > > Note that we also have shop=trade. It would be good to make the > > difference between both tags clear (of deprecate shop=trade, which I > > wouldn't oppose). > > > > "tra

[Tagging] Mistakes in German mapping guideline

2015-05-09 Thread Ulrich Lamm
The German Guideline "DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren" since longer time has contained a wrong description of the designation of bidirectional cycletracks. It claimed that they were generally marked with sign 1000-32, a couple of vertical arrows. In reality this sign is used, if the bi

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 09.05.2015 um 06:18 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > access = membership ? do you need the membership for access or to buy something? Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread Mike N
On 5/9/2015 6:46 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: do you need the membership for access or to buy something? Membership is required for both access or to buy something ... except for the Pharmacy. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org h

Re: [Tagging] How to model sidewalks, crossings and kerbs with respect to routing applications?

2015-05-09 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 07.05.2015 21:11, wrote Andrew Guertin: > On 05/07/2015 12:52 PM, Philip Barnes wrote: >> I still favour tagging the road with sidewalk tags, unless the sidewalk >> is physically separate from the road. Otherwise you are limited to >> crossing at defined points. +1 > Many people ARE limited to

Re: [Tagging] How to model sidewalks, crossings and kerbs with respect to routing applications?

2015-05-09 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 07.05.2015 20:49, Clifford Snow wrote: > Like sidewalks, kerbs could be assigned to the road as in > both/right/left/none. But that doesn't solve the problem of crosswalks. > Since crosswalks are nodes, it is impossible to tag one side as > wheelchair accessible while the other side isn't. For

[Tagging] US-style destination sign tagging

2015-05-09 Thread Paul Johnson
It seems that the destination sign tagging is a bit European-specific in expecting signs to have only one border, back and arrow color. That makes it a little hard to tag signs like these multicolored phenomenons: http://mapillary.com/map/im/fiAnz2BPUy_AICzS24dSXw Suggested tagging, please? _

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread ael
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > Note that we also have shop=trade. It would be good to make the > difference between both tags clear (of deprecate shop=trade, which I > wouldn't oppose). Well, I first proposed shop=trade and while I have deleted the start of th

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread ael
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:10:38PM -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Matthijs Melissen > wrote: > > > Note that we also have shop=trade. It would be good to make the > > difference between both tags clear (of deprecate shop=trade, which I > > wouldn't oppose). > > > >

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread ael
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:49:31AM +1000, Warin wrote: > On 9/05/2015 11:10 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Matthijs Melissen > >mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>> wrote: > > > >Note that we also have shop=trade. It would be good to make the > >difference between

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread ael
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 12:35:25PM +0900, John Willis wrote: > > > > On May 9, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Wholesale implies a large quantity of goods, they sell in quantity (the > > quantity may be over some time, say a year). > > Then wholesale is an subta

Re: [Tagging] US-style destination sign tagging

2015-05-09 Thread Marc Gemis
Only 1 colour in Europe ? http://mapillary.com/map/im/ZAr8bJ8r3xZqADDlEu4CAw :-) It is mentioned on the discussion page of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details , but I can't find the section that they refer to. regards m On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Paul

Re: [Tagging] Proposed tag shop=wholesale

2015-05-09 Thread Tom Pfeifer
ael wrote on 2015-05-09 20:30: I suppose what "trade prices" means will vary in different countries. In the EU, I think that will mean VAT-exclusive prices, ... just for the records, that is not possible, a business cannot sell without VAT to a domestic customer, regardless whether it is a B2B

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of historic=monument

2015-05-09 Thread Warin
On 8/05/2015 7:22 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-05-08 10:15 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis >: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Brad Neuhauser mailto:brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>> wrote: a photo of a stone cross over 5m tall since you cannot walk in

Re: [Tagging] US-style destination sign tagging

2015-05-09 Thread John Willis
> On May 10, 2015, at 1:31 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > It seems that the destination sign tagging is a bit European-specific in > expecting signs to have only one border, back and arrow color. That makes it > a little hard to tag signs like these multicolored phenomenons: > http://mapillar

[Tagging] access tags (was contact: tags)

2015-05-09 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
There was discussion about the contact: prefix... now how about the "access" tags? There are a lot of them, and trying to gather and present them is very hard: hov boat motorboat canoe bulk tanker mofa moped dog hazmat bicycle imdg ice_skates ... ... ... These could be mechanically retagged int

[Tagging] FYI: access=customers wiki page restored

2015-05-09 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
This page was deleted in 2011. I brought it back today: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dcustomers As 90,000 uses seems to qualify as at least defacto, if not "inuse". ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openst

Re: [Tagging] access tags (was contact: tags)

2015-05-09 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Sat, 9 May 2015 21:45:46 -0700 Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > There was discussion about the contact: prefix... now how about the > "access" tags? > > There are a lot of them, and trying to gather and present them is > very hard: > > hov > boat > motorboat > canoe > bulk > tanker > mofa > moped > do