On 4 May 2015 at 05:23, Andreas Goss wrote:
> The problem is that everybody is so strong against mechanical edits that it
> is pretty much impossible most of the time
No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority.
The problem is that there is a very vocal minority against me
Greetings.
In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
"summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
"camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
refers to children and adolescents, but some of these camps also cater t
Reading about a refugee situation the other day I realized that “camp” can mean
quite different things in different contexts. So I’d be a bit leery about going
from a fairly specific term to a more general one, even if I doubt that a
refugee camp would be tagged under leisure.
Perhaps, to be mo
2015-05-04 15:30 GMT+02:00 Tod Fitch :
> Reading about a refugee situation the other day I realized that “camp” can
> mean quite different things in different contexts. So I’d be a bit leery
> about going from a fairly specific term to a more general one, even if I
> doubt that a refugee camp woul
2015-05-02 22:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> this is an urban example of a small and dense one for reference:
> https://www.bing.com/maps/?q=Chausseestrasse+43+Entwicklungs+GmbH%2C+Charlottenstr.+16%2C+Berlin%2C+Deutschland&cp=45.472599029%7E9.1880998609
>
sorry, here is the correct li
2015-05-03 2:33 GMT+02:00 David Bannon :
> Martin, does that concern also extend to camp_pitch=yes ?
yes, you need at least one key or k/v combination that gets the object
imported, also with hstore enabled.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Ta
2015-05-03 12:05 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić :
> I agree, website is not the best tag for big unifications, but it's ok
> when you have nothing else. For example a chain of 10 bakeries in two
> cities. Having the same website tag is more than ok for that case. Although
> ref:vatin=* is certainly bett
2015-05-03 16:07 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen :
> This is correct. There is a security checkpoint at the gate, and
> pedestrians are not normally let in unless they are known to security.
> This is different from a national border checkpoint, because there are
> no such checkpoints at places where
2015-05-03 12:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
> I can understand access=private for most VC buildings, but, roads, that
> seems highly unlikely.
think of it as of a military base, it is not the same, but somehow similar,
also there you'll have roads that are not accessible to the public
Cheers,
Ma
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 06:30:33 -0700
> From: Tod Fitch mailto:t...@fitchdesign.com> >
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org> >
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Camps
> Message-ID: mailto:c0cdf3a2-52d6-4dfb-add8-5b4a7f937...@fitchdesign.co
On 4 May 2015 at 12:50, Mark Bradley wrote:
> Greetings.
>
>
>
> In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
> "summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
> "camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
> refers to chil
> On May 4, 2015, at 1:02 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
>
> Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
> 'organised_camp' ?
>
May want to hold that for something else. . .
In at least one forest area I know of the agency managing the area calls church
and scout camps
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Mark Bradley
wrote:
> In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
> "summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
> "camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
> refers to children and ado
.
>
> -1
> Too easily confused with campgrounds.
Yep, +1
>
> The core difference between a "summer camp" and a campground is that
> the former has organized communal activities,
> and probably one or more themes (kids, religion, archery, etc.), and
> probably restrictions on arrival and depar
On 4 May 2015 at 21:39, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 2015, at 1:02 PM, pmailkeey .
> wrote:
> >
> > Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
> 'organised_camp' ?
> >
>
> May want to hold that for something else. . .
>
>
Such as ?
> In at least one forest area
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, John Willis wrote:
> I think this will best handled in operator for existing camp sites (plus
access=private) or possibly make a separate tag under school= for the
school camps - as those are usually very affiliated with the district or
region operating them.
+-0
16 matches
Mail list logo
