Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-04-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-04-20 2:14 GMT+02:00 David Bannon : > Would camp_site:pitch=42 be more appropriate ? > I think the number should go into ref, e.g. ref=42 camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes (etc., e.g. permanent, tent, ...) not actually proposed or detailed yet Cheers, Martin

[Tagging] Outdoor DSLAM

2015-04-20 Thread Andreas Labres
I'm looking for a good tagging for an outdoor DSLAM: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Subscriber_Line_Access_Multiplexer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_subscriber_line_access_multiplexer (in Austria they are called ARU = "Access Remote Unit" and bear a label "ARU###", so they are

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor DSLAM

2015-04-20 Thread fly
Am 20.04.2015 um 15:31 schrieb Andreas Labres: > I'm looking for a good tagging for an outdoor DSLAM: > >http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Subscriber_Line_Access_Multiplexer >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_subscriber_line_access_multiplexer > > (in Austria they are called ARU = "

Re: [Tagging] proposal - camp_site=

2015-04-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
I was doing some mapping in Michigan and noticed that the National Park Service uses the tag backcountry=yes to indicate remote or primitive camping areas. I think it needs to be added it to the list of related tags in this proposal. There are 1300 of these tags existing presently. It might also

Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
The location of the deepest channel can change over time, as mudbanks or sandbanks shift position. This is why commercial vessels operating on rivers frequently rely upon a succession of pilots, each familiar with a particular portion of the river. Unless an OSM mapper has surveyed a portion of

Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
IMO you guys are kidding yourselves if you think most mappers actually measure the depth of rivers before drawing in the "main stream". That would be nice but it ain't so. Speaking for myself, as someone who has added hundreds of rivers and streams to OSM, there isn't one for which I've actually us

Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-04-20 18:14 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout : > IMO you guys are kidding yourselves if you think most mappers actually > measure the depth of rivers before drawing in the "main stream" yes, it is not the typical way we do map, but it is an ideal / a clear definition how it ideally should be. Some

Re: [Tagging] proposal - camp_site=

2015-04-20 Thread David Bannon
Dave, do you think that the characteristics of 'backcountry' overlap with the more generic 'basic' ? 'Basic' currently includes roadside stops so we could not replace it with 'backcountry'. As I understand it, the term 'backcountry' is unique to the US ? I am not opposed to adding another value

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-04-20 Thread David Bannon
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 11:13 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I think the number should go into ref, e.g. > ref=42 > camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes (etc., e.g. permanent, > tent, ...) not actually proposed or detailed yet > Martin, think that makes sense, there are a whole range of

Re: [Tagging] proposal - camp_site=

2015-04-20 Thread John Willis
Backcountry would be the same as a trekking site, as I understand it. Probably the same as a wilderness camp, or similar difficult-to-access camps with few or little amenities. Javbw > On Apr 21, 2015, at 7:27 AM, David Bannon wrote: > > Dave, do you think that the characteristics of 'backc

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trailhead

2015-04-20 Thread Brandon Knight
Thanks to the 9 or so of you that responded here and the 2 on the Talk page. A few points: * My definition of a trailhead as "the point at which a trail begins" was a dictionary definition. Others such as Oxford define it a "place where a trail begins". I think it is clear from that and from th

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-04-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2015-04-20 2:14 GMT+02:00 David Bannon : > >> Would camp_site:pitch=42 be more appropriate ? >> > > I think the number should go into ref, e.g. > ref=42 > camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes (etc., e.g. permanent, tent, > ...

Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:47 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > The location of the deepest channel can change over time, as mudbanks or > sandbanks shift position. This is why commercial vessels operating on > rivers frequently rely upon a succession of pilots, each familiar with a > particular port

Re: [Tagging] Does oneway:bicycle apply to cycleway=track?

2015-04-20 Thread Paul Johnson
Is there an aerial we can correspond this with? On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:33 PM, 715371 wrote: > Am 26.02.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Paul Johnson: > > What's the location we're working with? > > Here a location for cycleway=opposite_track: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4769712#map=18/53.07986/8