Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On 04/04/2015, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/04/2015 8:58 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > It is a 'No' vote. Not an abstain. > > . > For an English definition see > http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/154075?redirectedFrom=published#eid That's behind a paywall. Wou

Re: [Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

> Am 03.04.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > If the camp_site information 'tourist', 'scout', 'refugee' etc is outside OSM > then the render/user has no hope of determining which it is. While I can agree that scouts are implying also a leisure component (besides eg e

Re: [Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

I don't say that tourist, scout, refugee should be outside OSM. My statement is that the group key (tourism, shop, highway, ...) is not needed, as all information is in the value (hotel, supermarket, motorway, ...). Attribute tags that give more information about the main key (opening_hours=...) re

[Tagging] One if by Land, two if by Sea

A recent proposal I promoted turns out to have a flaw. It's amenity=sanitary_dump_station. Despite fairly extensive discussion on this list, apparently nobody with a boating background had a good look at the proposal. The flaw only came to light as tagging started. Can you figure out the flaw?

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:23 AM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > One can try to write a page defining what "published" means in the > context of wiki proposals. But given the current level of controversy, > I wish the authors good luck :p This mailing list community veers toward nit picking and bike

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On 5/04/2015 8:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:23 AM, moltonel 3x Combo > wrote: One can try to write a page defining what "published" means in the context of wiki proposals. But given the current level of controversy, I wish the author

[Tagging] Edit of wiki page amenity=drinking_water for man_made=water_tap

Hi, I have edited the wiki page on amenity=drinking_water https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water To reflect the new tag man_made=water_tap This suggests that the correct tag to use for a water tap is man_made=water_tap ... and that amenity_drinking_water is for drink

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

Honestly, this "approved" v. something else is a storm in a tea cup. The proposals have been (or not) approved. Yes, by a small minority of OSM mappers but ones who have thought about the proposal and they are not in any way an exclusive group. It does not say compulsory, required or anything pre

Re: [Tagging] Edit of wiki page amenity=drinking_water for man_made=water_tap

The proper way to tag water tap with drinking water is to use both and amenity=drinking_water and man_made=water_tap. On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 10:16:58 +1000 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have edited the wiki page on amenity=drinking_water > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Rename wiki status "Approved" to "Published"

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/04/2015 8:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > This mailing list community veers toward nit picking and bike shedding, > and tends to block rather than guide forward change. It's also a tiny > fraction of the mapping communi