Re: [Tagging] Tagging accepted payments at each toll lane

2015-03-03 19:07 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt : > By the time you get to that level of tagging, > why not micro map each lane? > One of the reasons (not a good reason) is that when I and others did that we got bashed because of our pointlessly detailed representation, despite it being actually a good

Re: [Tagging] Tagging accepted payments at each toll lane

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jake Wasserman wrote: > I'm trying to capture the accepted payment for each lane at a toll booth. > I haven't been able to find any other examples of this and I'm hoping for > some pointers here. > > One thought is to use the ":lanes" suffix in conjunction with "p

Re: [Tagging] Tagging accepted payments at each toll lane

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote: > 2015-03-03 19:07 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt : > >> By the time you get to that level of tagging, >> why not micro map each lane? >> > > One of the reasons (not a good reason) is that when I and others did that > we got bashed because of our poi

Re: [Tagging] Tagging accepted payments at each toll lane

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote: > 2015-03-03 19:07 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt : > >> By the time you get to that level of tagging, >> why not micro map each lane? >> > > One of the reasons (not a good reason) is that when I and others did that > we got bashed because of our po

Re: [Tagging] Tagging accepted payments at each toll lane

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Simone Saviolo > wrote: > >> 2015-03-03 19:07 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt : >> >>> By the time you get to that level of tagging, >>> why not micro map each lane? >>> >> >> One of the reasons (not a good reason) i

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/register This is for books where people enter their names, routes and comments. These books are located on peaks, along trails, in buildings and in caves. In German we call them Gipfelbuch, Steigbuch, Hüttenbuch, Gästebuch, Höhlenbuch, Pilgerbuc

Re: [Tagging] Proposed: landuse=civic_admin - looking for comments.

2015-03-06 4:23 GMT+01:00 John Willis : > On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > what about the pentagon or the NSA headquarters? I would likely include > them in "civic_admin" and surely in some sort of "governmental" landuse, > but I don't think these are places where t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/register > > This is for books where people enter their names, routes and comments. > These > books are located on peaks, along trails, in buildings and in caves. > In German we call t

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

Martin, could we get an example of what you're proposing at Pioneer Courthouse Square ? Portland's central transit hub and main square seems like it would be a suitably complex use scenario that would make all other examples simpler. On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/register > > This is for books where people enter their names, routes and comments. These > books are located on peaks, along trails, in buildings and in caves. > In German we

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - courtyard

On 13.02.2015 13:21, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > I'm now in favour of man_made=courtyard, because it is man made (as opposed > to natural) without doubt, and it is similar to man_made=cutline. Both > cutlines and courtyards are intentionally empty spaces, and both are only > defined by their sourro

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:40:23AM +, ael wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/register > > > > This is for books where people enter their names, routes and comments. These > > books are located on

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On 06/03/2015 11:48, ael wrote: I don't know if any of the Dartmoor boxes are marked in OSM. A very Addition: I just found one of them: http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/1129854737 http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.65508/-3.97769&layers=D ael I suspect that a better tag than "

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On 06.03.2015 12:09, Paul Johnson wrote: > May be related to the United States Department of Agriculture's National > Forest Service use permits. Typically a small wooden box with some pencils > and waterproof application cards inside, on which you are either strongly > encouraged or legally obli

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

When you enter a National Park in a country in Africa you usually have to register with the gatekeeper (not the same as the ticket counter) On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:47 PM Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > On 06.03.2015 12:09, Paul Johnson wrote: > > May be related to the United States Department of A

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > May be related to the United States Department of Agriculture's National > Forest Service use permits. Typically a small wooden box with some pencils > and waterproof application cards inside, on which you are either strongly > encouraged o

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - register

The Dartmoor Letter Box dates back 50 years. It was setup as a letter box. i.e. you would leave a card or letter and the next person to visit would take the latter and the put it in an "proper" letter box. My experience dates backs 35 years. If they are still used in this way then perhap

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

On 6/03/2015 11:50 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Maybe add position=top position=bottom the direction of the way is fragile. The incline=up/down is used for that reason on a step way ... For Portugal, Lisbon, Queluz_National_Palace - inconsistent width http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46

Re: [Tagging] Proposed: landuse=civic_admin - looking for comments.

themselves(?)). My original point was, that I didn't find it very clear that on one side the definition is: > > ___ > "This proposal aims to introduce a new value for landuse=* for Civic / > Governmental / public institutional building administration complexes, for > correctly tagging areas u