On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Simone Saviolo <simone.savi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2015-03-03 19:07 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: >> >>> By the time you get to that level of tagging, >>> why not micro map each lane? >>> >> >> One of the reasons (not a good reason) is that when I and others did that >> we got bashed because of our pointlessly detailed representation, despite >> it being actually a good model and the easiest way for consumers to >> understand what's going on. >> > > It seems a very reasonable way to map. The individual lanes method embeds > quite a bit more information about the road geometry, not the least of > which is the (brief) switch to a median. It's also dead simple to look at > and determine if it's right. > Not only that, but it cleanly handles situations where you have a PIKEPASS, in which there might only be one reasonable way to go through without stopping, and only one possible way to go through if you're changing highways <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.22177/-96.57349>. > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
