[Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

2014-12-25 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Dear mapping and cycling friends as that article is in German, it is questionable, if the international mailig list is a good adress, but in German language, I've found only local mailing lists. As one can hear and read in discussions, and as is visible from the results of mapping, a lot of map

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Andreas Goss
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema for it. After I failed to address the issues with leisure=gym in my last proposal (ambiguity of the word "gym) and

Re: [Tagging] Accuracy of survey

2014-12-25 Thread christian.pietz...@googlemail.com
the problem with nodes is, that they are easily overssen. It would be nice to have the possibility to show a warning when moving an opject with high accuracy. The best examples are GPS reference points like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2977364293 Since they have fixed coordinates it wou

Re: [Tagging] Accuracy of survey

2014-12-25 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
TP> It was not clear if the OP indeed wants to map pipelines, TP> or was just quoting the pipeline expert for his opinion about TP> surveying methods. the latter. I'm referring to all nodes, not just pipelines & marker. Just used the conversation I had some time ago as an example. W> Terms !! W>

Re: [Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

2014-12-25 Thread Marc Gemis
I never understood the cycleway=opposite. I would really need a picture of a situation where you need it. IMHO you do not have to use this tag on a oneway street where cyclists can drive in both directions, but on their own side. So I think your requirement to always add it to a oneway street that

Re: [Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

2014-12-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
cycleway=opposite is useful for marking that cyclists may drive in both direction, \ but there is no marked contraflow lane (for streets with contraflow lane there is cycleway=opposite_lane tag). 2014-12-25 20:36 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > I never understood the cycleway=opposite. I would really ne

Re: [Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

2014-12-25 Thread Marc Gemis
I don't agree, the definition says: --- Use *cycleway*=opposite for situations where cyclists are permitted to travel in both directions on a road which is one-way for normal traffic, in situations where there is no dedicated contra-flow lane marked for cyclists. In practice there is typically a v

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 75

2014-12-25 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Does this table help you? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts As you can see, it suggests some innovative tags. And it also suggests an alternative for opposite track. best regards Ulrich Am 25.12.2014 um 20:45 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > Me

Re: [Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

2014-12-25 Thread Marc Gemis
It's the last case of "Cars in one direction, cycling in both". I don't see what the value of "cycleway=opposite" is, when there is already a oneway:bicycle=no. Of course cyclists while drive in the opposite direction then and on the right side of the street for them. There is no cycleway so wh

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss wrote: > Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the > German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we > still don't have tagging schema for it. Thanks for addressing this. Fitness centres really nee

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2014-12-25 22:35: On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss wrote: Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we still don't have tagging schema for it. Thanks for

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 63, Issue 76

2014-12-25 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Now I've understood you, and I think I agree with you: This "cycleway=opposite" is something like an abused tag, as in reality there is no cycleway. The problem is that no renderer understands "oneway:bicycle=no", which would be the correct tag. I have mailed and phoned to the maintainers of t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre

2014-12-25 Thread Clifford Snow
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Andreas Goss wrote: > Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the > German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we > still don't have tagging schema for it. > > After I failed to address the issues with leisu

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs. optional cycletracks)

2014-12-25 Thread Pee Wee
First of all my compliments for seeking the opinions of the tagging mailing list and your effort to improve OSM. Here are my 2 cents 1 Why does OSM need to distinguish between obligatory and optional cycle ways? As a cyclist myself I can see some reasons why it could be useful for routers and/