Re: [Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

2014-12-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-02 8:04 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer : > I agree with you if you say that “usage” sounds like a very general key > and not a railway specific key. So the railway guys have just been a little > faster than the power guys and “occupied” this key. > although it would have been better also for a r

Re: [Tagging] How one should tag different sections of library?

2014-12-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-01 23:55 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > Each part has its name, but it is name for this part of the library - for > example "Main lending library" (Wypożyczalnia Główna), > "Children's Section" (Wypożyczalnia dla dzieci). > > > "I believe multiple libraries aren't any problem" > > > For e

Re: [Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

2014-12-02 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
LS> I agree with you if you say that “usage” LS> sounds like a very general key and not a railway specific key. So the LS> railway guys have just been a little faster than the power guys and LS> “occupied” this key. I would accept this and search another key to avoid LS> unnecessary conflicts. I d

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Appearantly nobody cares for access any more? Maybe my mail was too long, or you got the impression that this was referring to Italy only. In short, I think we should add more access classes to the wiki: - armed_forces=yes/no etc. (identifier cannot be "military" because that key is taken) - car

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Marc Gemis
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > - public_utility (this was referred to as "public administration" in my > original mail, but has now been corrected after I found the actual legal > text [1]). > these include: public bodies / statutory corporations and public offices,

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Philip Barnes
On Tue Dec 02 2014 13:48:56 GMT+ (GMT), Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Appearantly nobody cares for access any more? > Maybe my mail was too long, or you got the impression that this was > referring to Italy only. > > In short, I think we should add more access classes to the wiki: > > - armed_

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-02 15:04 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes : > I would suggest the tag private_hire. thank you, that sounds good and superficial internet search confirms that we are talking about the same kind of service. Would you agree that those aren't a part of psv? _

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Ole Nielsen
On 02/12/2014 14:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: In short, I think we should add more access classes to the wiki: - armed_forces=yes/no etc. (identifier cannot be "military" because that key is taken) I think military_personnel=* is better. "Armed forces" in my opinion refers to the entire

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

2014-12-02 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2014-11-17 23:26 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan : > >> What about introducing a name space: >> water_source:potable=designated | mineral | heilwasser (I failed to find >> a good English-language analogue, could

Re: [Tagging] access in the wiki

2014-12-02 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 24.11.2014 12:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > We are currently trying on the Italian mailing list to get a good tagging > for the ZTL (zona a traffico limitato - limited traffic zone), which do > exist in various Italian cities and are not "LEZ" (low emmission zones) > because the latter accord