Usually it is pretty obvious when you should make a new value and when
not, but with food and drinks it is endless:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/vending#values
If you use vending=milk instead of vending=drinks+drink:milk=yes where
do you draw the line? Does vending=drinks assume soft d
I think that when we get to that level, we can have no more structure in
tagging. The last structured tag should be "vending=food;drinks", and after
that all the other values should be crumpled into one tag. Something like:
food=sandwitches;Mars;Snickers;bubblegum;chocolate;salty snacks;ice
cream;
Hi Janko,
I disagree.
If (!) any software uses that particular tag, it should/would try to
translate at least some of these tags to it's UI language, getting:
"Sandwiches, Mars, Snickers, Kaugummi, Schokolade, Salzige Snacks, Eis"
as a german example for the tag you mentioned.
For showing it as it
and treat it simmilar to note=* tag. If anyone is going to use that
data, it's not going to be anything more than showing all the text raw
to the user.
I completely disagree here.
* If I have some kind of public transport app then most of the time I
would be interested in some snacks or soft d
On 11 July 2014 18:30, Andreas Goss wrote:
> I completely disagree here.
>
> * If I have some kind of public transport app then most of the time I would
> be interested in some snacks or soft drink / coffee, not so much in
> vegetables or milk.
I prefer to drink milk than other soft drinks, when
+1
My point is not to argue for one set of tags over anther; but to
illustarte that such pinnickety bikeshedding [1], based on one's
personal experiences and preferences, is unhelpful and inefficient.
LOL
I totally agree with Andy — Some of these discussions are seemingly endless
maybe because, a
How the heck is any map going to cover ALL the practically infinite
variations we might invent to describe shops and other items? It's crazy!
The whole point of tagging in more detail is for maps to be able to be
more selective about what kind of food/drink vending machines they show.
As poin
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> OSM US:
>
> I've been using some routing engines to map fitness routes (e.g. Strava)
> that use OSM data. Along our US coasts, there are beaches. The beaches I'm
> familiar with are popular with walkers and joggers to go up and down the
> sho
My proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
has been in RFC state for a year, and the only comment from other users was
a personal message concerning the licence of my photos. So it seems that
there are no objections, and that we should proceed to voting.
> Am 12/lug/2014 um 00:27 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> My proposal
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
> has been in RFC state for a year
Maybe a whole year is a bit long...
3 comments:
- you write natural=bare_rock is about rock as the surface ma
On 12.07.2014 01:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Am 12/lug/2014 um 00:27 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
>>
>> My proposal
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
>> has been in RFC state for a year
>
>
> Maybe a whole year is a bit long...
>
> 3 comments:
>
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:27:03 +0200,
Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> My proposal
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
> has been in RFC state for a year, and the only comment from other
> users was a personal message concerning the licence of my photos.
When
12 matches
Mail list logo
