It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is
storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. Someone
suggests to use "amenity=public_building" but it's deprecated now in
the wiki... "building=public" doesn't fit well here because it's an
area and is not open to the p
Maybe tag it as a private parking?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:06:28 -0800 Pieren wrote
It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is
storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. Someone
suggests to use "amenity=public_building" but
Hi -
In the past I've seen people use landuse=depot
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
Dan
2014-02-19 9:06 GMT+00:00 Pieren :
> It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is
> storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. Someone
> suggests t
It appears you're stuck between a rock and a hard place. According to the
Wiki you can not use amenity=public_building (although I do not understand
why its use is deprecated) and must use building=public. I can see why you
object to this but such buildings are, in one sense, public in that they
ar
Pieren wrote:
It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is
storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services.
I've gone with "landuse=industrial, industrial=depot" for these in the past:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254083705
(although arguably the "name" on t
For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called
"corporate yards".
Since "industrial=depot" seems to have only one use at present and does not fit
exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged as
"landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_
Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki page...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
428 instances in taginfo
2014-02-19 16:27 GMT+00:00 Tod Fitch :
> For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called
> "corporate yards
2014-02-19 17:32 GMT+01:00 Dan S :
> Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
> page...
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
> 428 instances in taginfo
>
> +1
But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.co
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM, sabas88 wrote:
>> Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
>> page...
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
>> 428 instances in taginfo
> +1
> But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
> http://gi
I walked past a storefront used by an online store on a street where
I was trying to tag all addresses and businesses, and it wasn't
clear to me the right way to tag this store.
I could have used shop=herbalist (and actually did, for now), but
that seems to suggest that it's a shop that you can wa
you could use office=e-commerce or something like that:
At that geolocation it's an office, but it operates in the e-commerce
section, so it's probably an online shop.
Not sure if that's the best value, but that's what values are for, right?
regards
Peter
Am 19.02.2014 18:22, schrieb L. David B
2014-02-19 18:22 GMT+01:00 L. David Baron :
> I walked past a storefront used by an online store on a street where
> I was trying to tag all addresses and businesses, and it wasn't
> clear to me the right way to tag this store.
>
> I could have used shop=herbalist (and actually did, for now), but
> Am 19/feb/2014 um 18:20 schrieb Pieren :
>
> Thanks all for you suggestions. "depot" is the closest for what we
> need although it's not only a depot for vehicles. It's also keeping
> various equipments required by municipalities (could be street
> furnitures, salting of roads, plants (winter)
2014-02-19 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren :
>
>
> Btw, use simply "depot=*" instead of "depot:type=*". I don't
> understand this recent trend to add a ":type" suffix in subtags. It
> was not the case in the past (e.g. "building=*", "wood=*",
> "traffic_signals=*", etc, etc, etc)
>
>
Simply because there's
2014-02-19 22:04 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> depot will probably still fit: there are repair depots, storage depots etc.
>
> Maybe there c
>
> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistics_center
>
>
> the landuse would be industrial I guess.
>
>
Why use landuse=industrial? Because it's rendere
office plus website= seems to pretty much do it.
Using the shop tag creates too much risk that it will be treated as a place
one can visit.
(e.g. if https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/116 is
ever implemented,
it would show up).
__
16 matches
Mail list logo