Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki page... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot 428 instances in taginfo
2014-02-19 16:27 GMT+00:00 Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com>: > For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called > "corporate yards". > > Since "industrial=depot" seems to have only one use at present and does not > fit exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged > as "landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_yard" with operator="City of > XXXX" and maybe name="XXX Corporate Yard" > > -Tod > > > > On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:37 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: > >> Pieren wrote: >>> It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is >>> storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services. >> >> I've gone with "landuse=industrial, industrial=depot" for these in the past: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254083705 >> >> (although arguably the "name" on that should actually be "operator") >> >>> Someone >>> suggests to use "amenity=public_building" but it's deprecated now in >>> the wiki... >> >> Whoever edited the wiki clearly failed to communicate with all the editor >> authors since "amenity=public_building" is a default in P2 (not that it's >> relevant in this case, since what you're describing isn't just a building. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andy >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging