Great! I'll surely count on your expertise, Matthijs. I think the guys at
the design list can help us arrive at a good visual style for this. We can
start with our 2 cents (malenki's suggestions seem like a great starting
point).
I agree with Richard, here on the tagging list we should not be conc
Ah, happy new years everyone! :D
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Fernando Trebien <
fernando.treb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great! I'll surely count on your expertise, Matthijs. I think the guys at
> the design list can help us arrive at a good visual style for this. We can
> start with our 2 cent
On 1 January 2014 13:35, Fernando Trebien wrote:
> If nobody disagrees, I'll consider that the tracktype tag is the best choice
> for this decision, and that any value besides grade1 deserves some marking
> meaning it's not in what most people consider "good condition".
Personally, I'm not a fan
Hello again,
As I was studying my previous topic here, I discovered that OSRM is now
supporting two undocumented tags, by HOT's request: impassable=yes and
status=impassable (
https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/commit/99e9d0d0230789b24df656435a4245edb57b4dac).
I believe the HOT team is usi
A combined approach makes sense to me. Then people can choose if they want
to use the tracktype tag or continue using just the surface tag (either may
make sense in different communities; I'd guess the German community will
prefer to use tracktype only with highway=track). I think the following
val
Am 01.01.2014 17:28, schrieb Fernando Trebien:
> A combined approach makes sense to me. Then people can choose if they want
> to use the tracktype tag or continue using just the surface tag (either may
> make sense in different communities; I'd guess the German community will
> prefer to use trackt
I meant "rendered as paved" in these situations indeed.
I believe you may prefer 3 different renderings: one for the absence
of the surface tag (same as the current default style), one for
paved-like surfaces (perhaps some darker solid outline - but we need
to distinguish that from bridges and via
Dear all,
As you remember, I had proposed to automatically change all objects tagged with
shop=musical_instruments into shop=musical_instrument.
I had asked permission from the Data Working Group for this edit.
Today, I received an answer from the Data Working Group. They
indicated that they do n
Hi Severin,
Thank you, that is very helpful.
-- Matthijs
On 24 December 2013 14:00, Severin MENARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I confirm shop that sell lottery tickets are very common in some countries,
> eg in Haiti. I uploaded one of my personal photo:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Lottery_h
Dear all,
There are currently various tags for gambling-related shops and
amenities in use. This proposal aims to clarify how these tags should
be used.
Voting on this proposal is now open:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gambling
The only difference with the last RFC is th
Dear all,
Currently the tags shop=bag (303) and shop=pet (4501) are used in
parallel to the less used tags shop=bags (177) and shop=pets (137). I
propose to agree on the defacto standard (the singular).
In order to accomplish that, I have created two proposal pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> Listing 1: way count of paved ways
:
:
> Listing 2: way count of unpaved ways
:
:
Finally, we just need a "paved" and "unpaved" value for "surface".
This combined with tracktype would be far enough and simple for
everyone.
Pieren
___
Maybe, or maybe not. Routers may adjust routing decisions for each
surface type. Asphalt and sett could be "paved" for rendering, but for
routing there may be a preference towards asphalt roads. Here in
Brazil, taking this into account when computing routes would greatly
improve route quality withi
Btw, Matthijs, a Brazilian user (one of the most interested in this
matter) just informed me that Garmin has a PC program called Mapsource
that paints unpaved roads with dashed outlines, just as you suggested.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> Maybe, or maybe not. Routers
Hello Fernando, I was just advised about this mailing list so have
joined yet another ! (sigh...)
Thanks for pushing this issue, my concern is that people's lives are
potentially at risk here.
While I am not really committed to using tracktype= as the trigger, on
the Austrialian mailing list we
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 22:00 -0200, Fernando Trebien wrote:
> A smarter router could even change this preference
> based on weather conditions (under rain, sett gets considerably
> slippery, and dirt would be far less preferable than compacted).
>
I guess that is why I like the use of trackty
Welcome, David. If you've just been advised about this discussion, you
may wish to read it from the start:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tags-useful-for-rendering-of-roads-in-poor-conditions-td5791303.html
Like you, I'm concerned about road safety. I'm concerned about making
the visual map better
I agree with you, but I think both tags would be useful in different
contexts. For instance, to me, tracktype (current + your new
recommendations) seems particularly oriented to car routing. For that
purpose, I agree that it would be a great choice. Surface, on the
other hand, seems more useful for
I want to add my opinion on this topic before you make a decision. Where I
do most of my mapping, the United States and Thailand, most roads are
paved. The assumption therefore is that in the absence of a surface tag,
the road is considered paved and rendered according to one of several
schemes (wh
We may need to vote to decide which is the best default assumption.
What most mappers would prefer, I believe, is that paved is default,
because most mappers (like you and me) are mapping in more developed
countries. It's not so good for poorer nations (as Peter pointed out),
but my main objective
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 22:57 -0200, Fernando Trebien wrote:
> Welcome, David. If you've just been advised about this discussion, you
> may wish to read it from the start:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tags-useful-for-rendering-of-roads-in-poor-conditions-td5791303.html
>
Actually, the particular
21 matches
Mail list logo
