On 11/30/2013 06:40 PM, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
So my revised suggestion to tag a webcam public on internet is
man_made=surveillance
surveillance= indoor|outdoor|public *
surveillance:type=camera *
surveillance:zone=weather|traffic|scenic *
contact:webcam=
name=*
operator=*
description=*
camer
2013/12/1 Matthijs Melissen
> Based on your comments, I have created a new version of the proposal
> for gambling features. The proposal can be found here:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gambling
>
thanks for this effort, it now looks fine.
The only thing a little s
2013/12/1 Jonathan
> You mean the cycle lane is only oneway and so bicycle=no on the road stops
> bikes both way?
I mean that bicycle=no bans bicycles from the road, while the actual
situation is that you have to use the cycleway if it leads where you are
going (and nothing bans you from usin
Hi,
I thought about this as well when I read the current proposal.
In Germany there are lot's of shops that are named as being primarily
for selling lottery tickets, but looking into it they are usually
selling the common combination of newspapers and magazines, tobacco and
so on. The lottery is of
On 1 December 2013 09:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> The only thing a little strange might be shop=lottery for shops whose "main
> purpose" is selling lottery tickets. Maybe I simply have never lived in an
> area where those exist, but really, I cannot recall of having ever seen a
> shop like th
On 01. des. 2013 00:44, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
Am 30.11.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Egil Hjelmeland :
contact:webcam= is fine, that tell we have a webcam. Do we really need
anything more to tell its a webcam?
I think contact:webcam is nonsense, you can't contact someone via his webcam.
Cheers
On 01. des. 2013 09:52, yvecai wrote:
On 11/30/2013 06:40 PM, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
So my revised suggestion to tag a webcam public on internet is
man_made=surveillance
surveillance= indoor|outdoor|public *
surveillance:type=camera *
surveillance:zone=weather|traffic|scenic *
contact:webcam=
Thanks for these examples.
Probably something like that should be added to the proosal for
documentation and further classification.
The proposal is very verbose with text, but hasn't much examples and
images for clarifications.
Adding something like the Images you linked to would be a benefit for
Hi,
I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves
a different purpose.
contact:webcam could define whom to contact for questions regarding the
webcam, or whom to contact BY webcam (as contact:phone is for how to
contact e.g. a shop by phone).
1) I would change the order, a
Yes, I agree. The images I linked to are not under an open license of
course, but I will ask the Spanish community if someone could take a
picture. Would any of the Germans on this list perhaps be able to make
a picture of a Lottoladen, prefarable a picture that both shows that
it is called 'Lotto'
On 01. des. 2013 15:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Hi,
I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves
a different purpose.
contact:webcam could define whom to contact for questions regarding the
webcam, or whom to contact BY webcam (as contact:phone is for how to
contact e.g.
Am 01.12.2013 16:05, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland:
> On 01. des. 2013 15:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves
>> a different purpose.
>> contact:webcam could define whom to contact for questions regarding the
>> webcam, or whom to co
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 00:44 +0100, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
>
> Am 30.11.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Egil Hjelmeland :
>
> > contact:webcam= is fine, that tell we have a webcam. Do we really need
> > anything more to tell its a webcam?
>
>
> I think contact:webcam is nonsense, you can't contact som
On 12/01/2013 03:18 PM, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
I am not at all interested in spending months of my life arguing about
an elaborate schemes for cameras. I will just Get It Done.
I can't blame you for that :)
I think the key here is to use contact:webcam= . That alone is
enough to get make an o
Yes!
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 14:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
2) I would use url instead of contact, if it should refer to where the
webcams output can be seen, whcih would lead to webcam:url=*
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetma
I would agree, the contact key has not taken off and may fit for phone
or fax (although the old way is still more popular) the use for webcam
is back to front. Was the original intention to cover video calls like
skype?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 17:11, Peter Wendorff wro
Yes, I was vague in my comments. What I meant was that most,
fun/weather/scenic/city cams are open to all comers and therefore
providing uncontrolled surveillance where at least police or council
cameras are strictly regulated and their feed is largely private (except
if used in court).
My a
I didn't oppose because "I" don't need it in the UK, I opposed it
because I couldn't understand the need for it anywhere or how it solved
any problem.
However, in this instance I'm prepared to change my vote to abstain.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 07:03, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 01. des. 2013 18:11, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Am 01.12.2013 16:05, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland:
On 01. des. 2013 15:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Hi,
I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves
a different purpose.
contact:webcam could define whom to contact for questions re
Am 01.12.2013 21:04, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland:
> On 01. des. 2013 18:11, Peter Wendorff wrote:
>> Am 01.12.2013 16:05, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland:
>>> On 01. des. 2013 15:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Hi,
I'm not happy with contact:webcam, as the contact namespace IMHO serves
a different pur
On 1 December 2013 10:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I mean that bicycle=no bans bicycles from the road, while the actual
> situation is that you have to use the cycleway if it leads where you are
> going (and nothing bans you from using the road). If you want to turn left
> for instance but th
On 12/01/2013 03:33 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
I think, contact should be restricted to ways of getting in contact to
someone, and IMHO seeing images of a webcam is not getting in contact
to the webcam or "someone" else. regards Peter
I agree. "Contact" usually refers to a way to reach a person;
Or this is how you contact someone via webcam such as with skype (BTW I
realise that's not a webcam is but some people call it that)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 21:39, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On 12/01/2013 03:33 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
I think, contact should be restricted to ways o
:-) This whole discussion assumes cyclists obey traffic rules! In the
UK cyclists ride where they like! :-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 21:38, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 1 December 2013 10:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I mean that bicycle=no bans bicycles from the road, while
Compliance rates among amateur operators tend to be equal across all modes.
Not that professional drivers don't have their moments, but that's the
only group on the road that has a higher compliance rate than amateur
motorists and bicyclists.
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> :
I would say it assumes hat cyclists in theory have to obey traffic rules
and a map should reflect what they have to do, not what they do.
Walkers cross lawns wherever they want if that's a shortcut and rules
against that aren't enforced strictly, but we don't map any possible
shortcut.
regards
Pet
On 1 December 2013 21:38, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> I don't think this is true in the Netherlands. Situations like you
> describe are quite rare in the Netherlands, but I did find one:
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Marconibaan,+Nieuwegein,+The+Netherlands&hl=en&ll=52.02938,5.101267&spn=0.001
Am 01.12.2013 um 20:26 schrieb Jonathan :
> However, in this instance I'm prepared to change my vote to abstain.
As long as you don't vote yes all votes are counted the same as a "no", an
actual abstain requires to cast no vote at all
Cheers,
Martin
Am 01.12.2013 um 22:38 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
> Perhaps the answer depends on the meaning of 'leading into the same
> direction' in the convention: does making a turn qualifies as going in
> a different direction
+1
___
Tagging mailing list
Tag
Am 01.12.2013 um 22:47 schrieb Jonathan :
> :-) This whole discussion assumes cyclists obey traffic rules! In the UK
> cyclists ride where they like! :-)
In Italy as well, but in Germany they might even withdraw your driving license
(for the car) if you did certain infractions
Cheers,
M
30 matches
Mail list logo
