Re: [Tagging] Grades for obstacle=vegetation

2013-02-08 Thread Dave F.
Hi I'm not interest in this as: 1. It's far too detailed. There are much better thing I can spend my time mapping. 2. It's too variable. The different seasons, whether the farmer has gone down the lane with his hedge trimmer etc.etc. Sorry; I guess that's not what you wanted to here, but I th

[Tagging] bicycle-no on motorways

2013-02-08 Thread Dave F.
Hi Around my area in the UK a user is presently adding bicycle=no to all motorways. There was a discussion a while back whether it that tag was implied for motorways. If I remember, it was claimed there were some places (not UK) that allowed bicycles. What was the consensus? I'm not sure it'

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-no on motorways

2013-02-08 Thread Andre Engels
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Dave F. wrote: > Around my area in the UK a user is presently adding bicycle=no to all > motorways. There was a discussion a while back whether it that tag was > implied for motorways. If I remember, it was claimed there were some places > (not UK) that allowed bic

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-no on motorways

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Johnson
Most places imply roadways are vehicle=yes by default (even motorways), so adding the restriction explicitly isn't a bad thing, whether anyone thinks it's implied or not. On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Dave F. wrote: > Hi > > Around my area in the UK a user is presently adding bicycle=no to al

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-no on motorways

2013-02-08 Thread Steve Bennett
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave F. wrote: > Around my area in the UK a user is presently adding bicycle=no to all > motorways. There was a discussion a while back whether it that tag was > implied for motorways. If I remember, it was claimed there were some places > (not UK) that allowed bic