Re: [Tagging] Contents of tagging digest, Vol 41, Issue 8, message 4

> Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:57:36 +0100 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bridge types > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >Hi Martin, > null > viaduc

Re: [Tagging] Power Tagging

2013/2/3 Michael Patrick : > For reference, see the International Electrotechnical Commission ( > http://www.iec.ch/about/ ) Electropedia ( http://www.electropedia.org/ ) or > from the Glossary search at ( http://std.iec.ch/glossary ), to the > Overhead lines / Towers description page ( > http://

Re: [Tagging] Contents of tagging digest, Vol 41, Issue 8, message 4

2013/2/3 St Niklaas : >> viaduct >> A ''long'' rail, road, or other bridge made up of many short spans. >> no >> 7?572 0.45% hint for other mappers, no special treatment > I used that one, after reading the Wiki I abandoned it. > +1 actually the comment above is refering to bridge=no >> aqueduc

[Tagging] RFC - UN LOCODE tags

Hi everyone, The company I work for deals with shipping ports, UN LOCODEs, and shipping schedules - I had hoped to use OSM to correlate geographical type info and LOCODEs. The problem has become messier than I ever thought, and unfortunately OSM does not have much in the way of LOCODE related

Re: [Tagging] RFC - UN LOCODE tags

On 2/3/13 8:48 AM, doug.fra...@tarisoga.com wrote: I will write up a feature proposal on the wiki to outline the details, but first I wanted to see if there were any comments or advice people might have. I do plan to automate the updates - none of this is map data per se, but just tags, so I

Re: [Tagging] Power Tagging

On 03/02/2013 02:31, Michael Patrick wrote: For reference, see the International Electrotechnical Commission ( http://www.iec.ch/about/ ) Electropedia ( http://www.electropedia.org/ ) or from the Glossary search at ( http://std.iec.ch/glossary ), to the Overhead lines / Towers description page

Re: [Tagging] [Imports] RFC - Adding UN LOCODE tags to OSM

Followup to my post: I am here at the London OSM Hack Weekend and spoke to someone who explained to me the larger issues and questions about importing / updating metadata like LOCODEs that can't be surveyed - i.e. data where managing the process of keeping it current may be troublesome. I ag

[Tagging] Ski resort (once again)

The problem is the following: in this link, the nordic pistes belong to several interconnected 'resorts' or 'domains': http://www.pistes-nordiques.org/?zoom=13&lat=46.80895&lon=6.43328&layers=&e=false&m=raster There is the pistes of 'L'Auberson', 'Les Fourgs', 'La Seigne' and 'Jougne'. I think

Re: [Tagging] Is the difference between power station and sub station clear?

Hi folks, Here is the English translation of don-vip's answer to my last week message. --- Hi François, I'm glad to see someone be interested in that topic, and moreover a French one. I've actually built this proposition based upon the observation the power tagging model isn't properly finalize

Re: [Tagging] Ski resort (once again)

2013/2/3 yvecai : > The problem is the following: in this link, the nordic pistes belong to > several interconnected 'resorts' or 'domains': > > http://www.pistes-nordiques.org/?zoom=13&lat=46.80895&lon=6.43328&layers=&e=false&m=raster > > There is the pistes of 'L'Auberson', 'Les Fourgs', 'La Seig

Re: [Tagging] Ski resort (once again)

2013/2/3 yvecai > > So what about a relation > There is a rule in Openstreetmap called "relations are not categories". This is an explanation. I was thinking about this same problem (grouping ski resorts), and I wanted to introdu

[Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again)

There is already route=piste relations (the colors on the link provided). This is something else. Yves - Reply message - De : "Martin Koppenhoefer" Pour : "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Objet : [Tagging] Ski resort (once again) Date : dim., févr. 3, 2013 23:59 2013/2/3 yv