Hi.
I would suggest to add a short rationale in the "proposed key" section.
I think, the following arguments were useful (as long as it's carefully
described not to be requirements):
- these objects often are landmarks (let's meet under the clock, after
the advertising column turn right...)
-
2012/10/28 Peter Wendorff :
> I would suggest to add a short rationale in the "proposed key" section.
OK I added a few lines.
> I think, the following arguments were useful (as long as it's carefully
> described not to be requirements):
> - these objects often are landmarks (let's meet under th
In Iceland we sometimes have companies parking cars in public spaces or
in private land after making a deal with the owner. The cars are marked
with the company and almost always have advertising signs on the side.
How would that be marked in your proposal?
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 28/10/12 03:04, Ma
Am 28/ott/2012 um 15:32 schrieb Svavar Kjarrval :
> In Iceland we sometimes have companies parking cars in public spaces or
> in private land after making a deal with the owner. The cars are marked
> with the company and almost always have advertising signs on the side.
> How would that be marke
> 1) Polygon vs point for "Populated urban areas" (place=city, town...):
Hello, we talked about this problem in Italian list [1].
We agreed that boundaries and places should not be confused because in
general they refer to different things.
We also agreed that tagging the urban area with landuse=r
"Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
> 2) Boundary relation or place=* for higher administrative units?
> The overlap is especially visible in case of countries (but same
> arguments apply for other units like states, counties, ...).
> Majority of counties are in database represented twice - as node
2012/10/28 Frederik Ramm :
> On 27.10.2012 17:53, "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
>> 2) Boundary relation or place=* for higher administrative units?
>> The overlap is especially visible in case of countries (but same
>> arguments apply for other units like states, counties, ...).
>> Majority of c
