Hi.
I would suggest to add a short rationale in the "proposed key" section.

I think, the following arguments were useful (as long as it's carefully described not to be requirements): - these objects often are landmarks (let's meet under the clock, after the advertising column turn right...)
- often they are quite prominent

Reading your proposal and the amenity=clock page together, I miss the "suggested combination" of both for the common case of public clocks surrounded by or mounted together with advertising ... cubes? (compare example #1 on the clocks page). Probably that cubic thing is a candidate for an additional advertising value as well? (but I have no idea, what the name could be and if it's known enough to count as an own type.

Regards
Peter

Am 28.10.2012 04:04, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Please have a look at the advertising proposal, I am planning to get
this soon to voting:

  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/advertising

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to