2012/5/22 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2012/5/22 Martin Vonwald :
>> What is needed (IMO!) is some
>> kind of way (lets call it xway), that may consist of parts. Those
>> parts run by default parallel and may only be moved nearer to/farther
>> away from the center of the xway. Then you apply tags..
2012/5/23 Martin Vonwald :
> Let's have a look at a street around here: it has two general lanes,
> one cycle lane and two side walks. I should map this with:
> * one way is "main" way
> * two ways for the lanes
> * one way for the cycle lane
> * two ways for the side walk
> * one relation
> So thi
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> You have to keep in mind that most of the streets are in fact a
> collection of parallel features. Only at some points (junctions, ends)
> this might not be true. The proposed relation might(!) be a solution
> for some special cases (e.g. ir
2012/5/23 Richard Mann :
> Now if we had an editor that displayed some parallel lines if you put in
> cycleway=track, and maybe something similar on the standard rendering... A
> fancy renderer might take further tags about the degree and nature of
> separation into account, perhaps even interpolat
2012/5/23 sabas88 :
> What about building a proposal to extend landcover=* tag to meet FAO's
> system?
I think if you wanted to implement the FAO system you would need more
than one additional tag, so I suggest to make up a whole new proposal
to do this. Maybe you should also check if the FAO sys
There's also http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=advanced_stop_line
which uses a relation containing the way approaching the ASL and the node of
the junction of the ASL. With this method it's easier to determine the
direction of approach to the ASL than just tagging a single node alone.
Gre
Am 23.05.2012 10:32, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2012/5/23 Martin Vonwald:
* two ways for the sidewalk (if you like, mapped at the outside of the
sidewalk so it can be used to generate easily the area of the street)
-1 for the parantheses:
mapping the sidewalk "way" at one side of the sidewa
2012/5/23 Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2012/5/23 sabas88 :
> > What about building a proposal to extend landcover=* tag to meet FAO's
> > system?
>
>
> I think if you wanted to implement the FAO system you would need more
> than one additional tag, so I suggest to make up a whole new proposal
> to do th
On 23/05/12 10:52, Gregory Williams wrote:
> There's also http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=advanced_stop_line
> which uses a relation containing the way approaching the ASL and the node of
> the junction of the ASL. With this method it's easier to determine the
> direction of approach to
2012/5/23 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2012/5/23 Martin Vonwald :
>> Let's have a look at a street around here: it has two general lanes,
>> one cycle lane and two side walks. I should map this with:
>> * one way is "main" way
>> * two ways for the lanes
>> * one way for the cycle lane
>> * two ways for
2012/5/23 Andrew Chadwick (lists) :
> On 23/05/12 10:52, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> There's also http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=advanced_stop_line
>> which uses a relation containing the way approaching the ASL and the node of
>> the junction of the ASL. With this method it's easier to
The first example wasn't broken, IMO. It just shows that there are ASLs on
several approaches to the same set of lights. I've fixed all of the other
examples except the last one. These were mainly situations where the
constituent highway had since been split and there isn't editor support for
knowi
2012/5/23 Martin Vonwald :
>> So I end up with 4 ways (highway, 2 sidewalks, cyclelane), one
>> relation (area) and some nodes (lowered kerbs). Of course this is more
>> complex, but you also get a whole lot more of detail,
>
> I see it the other way around: the increase in complexity does not
> ju
2012/5/23 sabas88 :
> Regarding the software, here [0] states the non-commercial clause.
> Should this proposal require prior authorization by FAO offices?
> [0]http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y7220e/y7220e00.htm
It reads: "All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of
material in this inf
On 23/05/12 12:50, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> Before using a relation only for asl's, please think of the proposed
> junction relation [1]. Maybe if the asl's are just put there, we don't
> need a separate relation.
I'm coming to the conclusion that relations are unnecessary for ASLs.
They always exi
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Martin Vonwald :
>
> >>> If I
> >>> want to move the "street" I have to move seven ways.
> >> why would you want to move a street that you have surveyed up to this
> >> level of detail? I think this is hypothetical (and btw: it is 6 in
>
On 23/05/12 13:19, Gregory Williams wrote:
> If we need to show that an ASL is just for certain classes of traffic then
> I'm sure we could just use the normal access tags, i.e. bicycle=yes,
> psv=yes, etc.
That's an overloading of meaning, I think. The access tags are for
noting legal access[1],
17 matches
Mail list logo
