On 13/01/2012, at 23:34, Michael Krämer wrote:
>> If you'd read what I was replying to, you'd see that I don't think
>> access=permit would be a valid change.
> Well, I in fact I did - being a non-native speaker I tried to answer
> the question you've asked.
>
> So either I missed some point or
> Given that absolutely everything on the planet is accessible by at least
> someone with the right authority, permission, ownership, special equipment,
> etc. is there ever a need for access=no ?
As a default in combination with eg. access=no, foot=yes meaning
nothing except foot - it is easier
