> Given that absolutely everything on the planet is accessible by at least > someone with the right authority, permission, ownership, special equipment, > etc. is there ever a need for access=no ?
As a default in combination with eg. access=no, foot=yes meaning nothing except foot - it is easier than excluding each use individually. access=no alone is really not usable. Maybe for paths in places of nuclear explosions. LM_1 2012/1/15 Ben Johnson <tangarar...@gmail.com>: > On 13/01/2012, at 23:34, Michael Krämer <ohr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> If you'd read what I was replying to, you'd see that I don't think >>> access=permit would be a valid change. >> Well, I in fact I did - being a non-native speaker I tried to answer >> the question you've asked. >> >> So either I missed some point or my answer has been ambigous. In case >> the latter is true I'll give another try: >> - access=yes and access=private should be pretty clear to everyone. > > Well this raises an interesting question: > > Given that absolutely everything on the planet is accessible by at least > someone with the right authority, permission, ownership, special equipment, > etc. is there ever a need for access=no ? > > BJ > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
