[Tagging] Explain sport=multi

2011-12-08 Thread Erik Johansson
sport=multi is very well used but have no description in the wiki. Is there anyone that uses this tag? For some reason I get the feeling this is at least when I see it used as a shorthand for multiple values on a sport key e.g. sport=multi instead of: sport=soccer;basketball;curling http://tagi

Re: [Tagging] Explain sport=multi

2011-12-08 Thread Tobias Knerr
Erik Johansson wrote: > sport=multi is very well used but have no description in the wiki. Is > there anyone that uses this tag? > > For some reason I get the feeling this is at least when I see it used > as a shorthand for multiple values on a sport key I'd use sport=multi on a typical gym that

Re: [Tagging] Explain sport=multi

2011-12-08 Thread Erik Johansson
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 13:53, Tobias Knerr wrote: > Erik Johansson wrote: >> sport=multi is very well used but have no description in the wiki. Is >> there anyone that uses this tag? >> >> For some reason I get the feeling this is at least when I see it used >> as a shorthand for multiple values o

Re: [Tagging] Explain sport=multi

2011-12-08 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi. I would use it for sports facilities not dedicated to specific sports. If you look at a typical sports stadium not dedicated to a soccer team, you often have the running lane around, a sandbox for jumping, a facility to do high jumps, probably even facilities for shot-put and so on. Of cours

Re: [Tagging] (no subject)

2011-12-08 Thread fly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 06.12.2011 11:36, schrieb Jo: > > > 2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier mailto:vpott...@gmail.com>> > > Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > 2011/12/6 Jomailto:winfi...@gmail.com>>: > > I'd use a polygon (a

Re: [Tagging] Explain sport=multi

2011-12-08 Thread Brad Neuhauser
Another outdoors example is at a park or school where there is a field which is used for various sports--soccer, baseball, football, etc (even ice hockey when they create a rink for the winter)--at different times. On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote: > Hi. > I would use it for s