2011/4/28 David Murn :
> That doesnt detract from the original question, of what to map a site of
> historic significance.
historic=event and event=?
or historic:event=yes/ ?
the ever useful, never descriptive tourism=attraction could also be used.
cheers,
Martin
__
2011/4/28 David Murn :
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 07:34 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand
>>
>> "The brand=* is a larger entity that a place advertises itself as part
>> of"
>>
>> Which means that you put "Burger King" or "Barclay's" or
On 28 April 2011 17:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> historic=event and event=?
> or historic:event=yes/ ?
I like this suggestion. I noticed in JOSM there is a
historic=battlefield, but this and other similar events, like David's
suggestion about the great train robbery, would be good to be group
2011/4/28 Richard Welty
> On 4/27/11 8:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> If people can tag trees, surely things of historical significants
>> deserve to be allowed in OSM as well.
>>
> identifiable, physical objects that exist today, sure.
>
> the phase maps i want to do for the battle of antietam
2011/4/28 Simone Saviolo :
> phase maps. For example, I've mapped memorial sites related to battles of
> the Italian Risorgimento, but not the place where the battles themselves
> took place. Also, I've mapped many plates dedicated to kings, soldiers and
> patriots, because they're things that are
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 4/27/2011 7:32 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
>>
>> On 04/27/2011 06:17 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think the standard is brand=*.
>>>
>>> yes, this is also used for gas stations.
>>
>> That’s a different thing, I think.
>>
>> br
