2011/2/4 Nick Whitelegg :
>>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level
> If they aren't counted as national capitals surely it should be 3 anyway, as
> surely England, Wales and Scotland are the *immediate* next level down from
> the UK.
I don't know, this is best discussed on talk:uk I gue
Am 03.02.2011 20:01, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
> 2011/2/2 Tobias Knerr :
>> It might be useful in some cases, but it shouldn't be overused. If the
>> site is adequately described by a polygon, it can and imo should be
>> mapped as an area with the appropriate tags.
>
>
> +1
>
>> For example,
Steve Doerr writes:
> On 03/02/2011 20:22, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Can you please help me to find the right word for stuff that is added
> > later on top? (in German that would be something like "Bekrönung" or
> > "Spitze"): e.g.
>
> Tricky. Looking through the translations of Spitze at l
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer writes:
>
> the proposal is here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/obelisk
>
> Martin
I would be fun to try to tag some specimens of obelisks,
to see how the differences play out.
I haven´t read up on the tags, but I hope you
get the idea.
##
The paris
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:58 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> obelisk:material
> obelisk:weight (this is usually known due to the general interest in
> these pieces).
IMHO once again this strays outside the useful scope of a map.
Wikipedia, especially through dbpedia, is a much better place for
st
