On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
In urban area, you could also use the type 'street' to link the cycle track
and the highway.
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
What do you think of a key: "civilization" ? This could be used to
describe the people that built a certain feature (mostly historical
intentions).
Values could be:
etruscan
roman
greek
egyptian
mayan
...
I will make a proposal for this, if there is not already another tag in use.
cheers,
Martin
Looking up the wiki there are several proposals for protected / listed features.
1.
The oldest is this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unesco_world_heritage
suggesting historic=unesco_world_heritage
actually I'd like to deprecate this because using the key historic
will crea
2011/1/11 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> 2.
> There is also this:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage
another issue I have with this: the use of the key "operator". IMHO an
operator is someone who operates the site. In the case I'm currently
tagging this is a government agenc
Am 11.01.2011 04:26, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
I put adjacent=yes on the highway=cycleway, so the user of the
cycleway=track tag on the main road can ignore ways with adjacent=yes
on them. The user who'd prefer to use highway=cycleway ways doesn't
know t
Peter Wendorff schrieb:
Am 11.01.2011 04:26, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
I put adjacent=yes on the highway=cycleway, so the user of the
cycleway=track tag on the main road can ignore ways with adjacent=yes
on them. The user who'd prefer to use highway=cyc
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
>>
>> The user who'd prefer to use highway=cycleway ways doesn't
>> know that the cycleway=track is a duplicate, but routers only have to
>> give a slight preference for highway=cycleway over cycle
Why not use both tags, with landuse=depot on the parking area and office=towing
on the office? After all, most towing services will have both.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re: Towing service?
>From :mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Date :Tue Jan 11 01:39:18 America/
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Georg Feddern wrote:
> If the corresponding highway=*, cycleway=track is also tagged with the
> adjacent-Tag, router and renderer can choose in general, which sort of way
> they use - without any need for locating them.
>
>
Like the "is_in", "adjacent" sounds horri
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Pieren wrote:
> Like the "is_in", "adjacent" sounds horrible for spatial applications
> working with spacial database where all elements already have spatial
> coordinates.
I agree for nodes and polygons. Ways next to other ways aren't
so-easily capable of spatial
Hello!
Previous voting showed that a minor number of interested in this
feature mappers disagree with the surface= tag. In respect to them,
the proposal was redone, to use the following tagging scheme:
winter_road=yes
ice_road=yes
A value of surface=ice_road is obsoleted.
There were no
It was also not my idea to use relations to combine different road
objects to one road 'relation'.
-Robert-
Citeren Richard Mann :
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
The user who'd prefer to use highway=cycleway ways doesn
Sorry, but I read this too late.
Key=yes/no sounds horrible to me all the way.
In this case in fact you put something that intends to be a value into a key.
This not natural.
Surface=* was acceptable to me.
IMHO you also can describe the impassability by mentioning the months
in wich the road
Robert,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:08:21PM +0100, rob...@elsenaar.info wrote:
r> Sorry, but I read this too late.
Sorry, you did. I won't run this through a third month Draft/RFC/Voting cycle.
:(
r> Key=yes/no sounds horrible to me all the way.
r> In this case in fact you put something that i
Le 11/01/2011 13:34, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Looking up the wiki there are several proposals for protected / listed features.
1.
The oldest is this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unesco_world_heritage
suggesting historic=unesco_world_heritage
actually I'd like to de
2011/1/11 Vincent Pottier :
> But the heritage tag may be applied also to a node, to a way... not with
> boundaries
This is true. We could use the other tags still, without the
boundary-way. In the end all objects will be bigger then just a point,
so I'd expect from a detailed mapping to have are
Sounds like a good idea. Could you list an example with tags?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:01, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> What do you think of a key: "civilization" ? This could be used to
> describe the people that built a certain feature (mostly historical
> intentions).
> Values could be:
>
>
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer writes:
>
> What do you think of a key: "civilization" ? This could be used to
> describe the people that built a certain feature
> (mostly historical intentions).
> Values could be:
>
> etruscan
> roman
> greek
> egyptian
> mayan
> ...
>
> cheers,
> Martin
Good idea!
Maybe
Perhaps one could have separate tags for civilization and era. After all, many
of these civilizations overlapped to some degree, timewise, while being in
different parts of the world. In some cases, the different civilizations
traded with each other (for example, the Roman and Chinese civiliza
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:00:25 +0100
Vincent Pottier wrote:
> > The page suggests to use abbreviations as values, which is not
> > according to our general tagging rules (and IMHO pointless, why not
> > use the full word and get a more understandable mapping?). But there
> > are some useful ideas f
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:22:41 +0300
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> After a lot of discussions, majority of Russian mappers decided to
> ignore the tracktype/trackgrade tags for now. The road condition is
> very dependant on weather and ones chances to drive it strongly
> depend on vehicle that is going to
2011/1/11 Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) :
> Please visit again
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
thank you for the work on this. I have just 2 small comment on this:
"A station is an area dedicated to and particularly designed for
passenger access to Public Transpor
2011/1/11 :
> Why not use both tags, with landuse=depot on the parking area and
> office=towing on the office? After all, most towing services will have both.
+1, depending on the size. In the case they have 1 truck, depot seems
too much, maybe tagging them garage would be better then?
cheers
2011/1/11 Richard Mann :
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Pieren wrote:
>> Like the "is_in", "adjacent" sounds horrible for spatial applications
>> working with spacial database where all elements already have spatial
>> coordinates.
>
> I agree for nodes and polygons. Ways next to other ways ar
2011/1/11 John F. Eldredge :
> Perhaps one could have separate tags for civilization and era. After all,
> many of these civilizations overlapped to some degree, timewise, while being
> in different parts of the world. In some cases, the different civilizations
> traded with each other (for ex
1st International Workshop on Semantic Publication (SePublica 2011)
http://sepublica.mywikipaper.org
at the 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2011)
http://www.eswc2011.org
May 29th or 30th, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece
Keynote by Steve Pettifer, Manchester University, UK.
“Utopia Documents a
For clarity, could these be subtags of historic?
e.g.
historic=ruins
historic:civilization=roman
historic:period=aurelia
That way we can have more descriptive tags without worrying about conflicts
with non-historic meanings.
On Jan 11, 2011, at 4:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/1/11 Jo
Having civilization as a subkey to historic is a good suggestion.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] new key civilization
From :mailto:daniels...@gmail.com
Date :Tue Jan 11 19:35:13 America/Chicago 2011
For clarity, could these be subtags of historic?
e.g.
historic=ruins
histo
Dear Alexander,
I'm not sure if this is the right media to motivate semantic OSM focused
scientists for a publication.
If you have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Research
you can get a few contacts, that are related to RDF and OSM.
regards
Matthias
_
+1
This is a nice and very clear solution.
I like subtags more and more.
It's a kind of Advanced Tagging.
-Robert-
Citeren Daniel Sabo :
For clarity, could these be subtags of historic?
e.g.
historic=ruins
historic:civilization=roman
historic:period=aurelia
That way we can have more descript
30 matches
Mail list logo
