On 01/03/2011 08:11 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> On 03/01/2011 03:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 01/01/2011 07:54 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>>
>>> Is the adjacent path shared? if so, note that that would be the safer
>>> passage.
>> Most states prohibit bicycles from sidewalks, or limit their speed to a
>> walking
On 4 January 2011 07:19, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> BTW: My feeling is, that sluice gates formerly were tagged with
> waterway=weir most of the time anyway.
Doesn't mean they shouldn't be updated/added if there is a better tag...
> The suggested term floodgate would be more intuitive for me as a none
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 08:11 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>> On 03/01/2011 03:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On 01/01/2011 07:54 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>>>
Is the adjacent path shared? if so, note that that would be the safer
passage.
>>> Most states prohibit
I'm interested in mapping which direction of a street slopes down
(mainly for cycling purposes). The contour lines used by OpenCycleMap
don't have nearly enough resolution for this, yet many streets have a
noticeable slope (which can also be seen in how the roadside drains
are designed). Is there a
At 2011-01-04 07:13, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way to tag that a street is downhill in the
forward or backward direction?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
--
Alan Mintz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
> On 02.01.2011 22:40, Anthony wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
>>> I do not want someone telling me "this is not relevant enough" and
>>> having the right to delete my edits.
>>
>> Then make edits which are re
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Is there a way to tag that a street is downhill in the
> forward or backward direction?
Is the incline=* key[1] what you are looking for? You can specify that a
way goes uphill (incline=up) or downhill (incline=down) relative to the
way's direction. You can also use posit
Of course, this will require breaking the way into segments each time the slope
changes between uphill and downhill. On some terrain this won't be an issue,
but on rolling terrain you may have to have a great many nodes. Also, the
slope will need to be determined by someone on the ground, as i
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2011-01-04 07:13, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to tag that a street is downhill in the
>> forward or backward direction?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
Ah yes, that's what I was looking for. I searched for
It was June, here's the start of the thread:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-June/002563.html
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
> wrote:
> >> A scan through the wikipedia gives me
> >> international
2011/1/4 Steve Bennett :
> I have a feeling we discussed this a few months ago. My suggestion
> would be to simply use numbers, if you're talking about a ranking
> scheme:
>
> aeroway=aerodrome
> aerodrome_level=1|2|3|4|5
I agree. This does not mean that we cannot additionally tag services
and fa
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:45 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>> Also, I definitely think we should try and align to external standards.
>
> +1
Look at the ICAO classifications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airspace_class
Nonetheless I think the OSM classifications are good because they
handle t
Hi all
The vote for new tag shop=baby_care has been started. I've removed
section with 'assortment=*' to make it simple and propose one thing in a
time.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Infant_care_shop#Vote
Everyone is welcome
--
Sincerely, Artem
On 5 January 2011 04:06, Osmisto wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The vote for new tag shop=baby_care has been started. I've removed
> section with 'assortment=*' to make it simple and propose one thing in a
> time.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Infant_care_shop#Vote
>
> Everyone is
The Brussels cycle map (unfortunately only available in a print
version, as far as I can see) uses a coloured line on the right side
of the road for notably uphill (pink) and severely uphill (red). It
takes a bit of getting used to, but it conveys the information
reasonably efficiently.
Richard
O
On 4 January 2011 02:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/12/17 Pieren :
>
>
>> Yes and it would fine if we could continue in that way. Since landuses
>> shouldn't overlap
>
>
> where do you get this from? IMHO this is not defined in the wiki and
> looking at current "landuse values" like militar
On 4/01/2011 7:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
They both have elements of flow control, but function in quite different
ways and look very different. A weir is used to raise the water level or
control flow, with water flowing over the top. A sluice gate is essentially
a valve for small waterways.
In
On 5 January 2011 11:38, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I'm wary of the endless drive to create more high-level tags. It increases
> the burden on reusers of the data.
Normally I'd agree with you 100%, but in this case it's a bit
different because as pointed out earlier weirs tend to be non-moving
for th
On 5 January 2011 10:39, Stephen Hope wrote:
> Then you get the ambiguous tags, which can be both. What is a forest?
> A place where forestry (timber cutting, etc) happens? That's land
Actually I remember reading this in some other thread a long time ago,
a forest originally didn't necessarily
I have a go-kart track inside a go-kart club. It seemed appropriate to
tag the track as highway=raceway and the club as leisure=sports_centre.
However, mapnik renders the sports centre over the top of the track:
http://osm.org/go/uGnZ9F3P2--
Should I file a bug, or is there a better way to ta
On 5/01/2011 3:18 PM, John Smith wrote:
Perhaps a more generic approach would work, eg
waterway=flow_control
flow_control=weir|sluice_gate|flood_gate|spillway_gate|
Yeah something like that would be reasonable. What I'd like to see a lot
more of is planning ahead: coming up with a scheme in
+1
Very agree.
-Robert-
Citeren Steve Bennett :
On 4/01/2011 7:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
They both have elements of flow control, but function in quite different
ways and look very different. A weir is used to raise the water level or
control flow, with water flowing over the top. A sluice
On 5/01/2011 4:58 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Look at the ICAO classifications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airspace_class
That would work for airspace, but what about for airport classifications
themselves? I can't find anything on Wikipedia, other than individual
articles on "regional airpo
23 matches
Mail list logo
