Re: [Tagging] Airport subtypes

2010-12-31 Thread info
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: >> A recent import has highlighted the lack of suitable subtypes of >> airport in the tagging schema. >> There are some pages of lapsed concepts on the wiki of different >> airport subtypes >> >> A scan through the wikipedia gives me >> inte

Re: [Tagging] Airport subtypes

2010-12-31 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:58 AM, wrote: > Although I'd be careful about the first three without accurate knowledge > as they do have significant operational differences (particularly > international). It's my understanding that international status is not necessarily a measure of a major airport

Re: [Tagging] Airport subtypes

2010-12-31 Thread info
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:58 AM, wrote: >> Although I'd be careful about the first three without accurate knowledge >> as they do have significant operational differences (particularly >> international). > > It's my understanding that international status is not necessarily a > measure of a maj

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

2010-12-31 Thread Robert Elsenaar
Totally agree. More over, every time you use the symbol ":" in your tag, you mean that the subtag is telling something more specific about the maintag thats in front of it. This methode should be introduced more widely all over OSM to avoid annoying new and unnesseccerry tags or values. Robert

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

2010-12-31 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Robert Elsenaar wrote: > Totally agree. More over, every time you use the symbol ":" in your tag, you > mean that the subtag is telling something more specific about the maintag > thats in front of it. I have no idea what "subtag" and "maintag" are, but the symbol

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

2010-12-31 Thread Colin Smale
Surely is_in is purely geographic/geometric and can only strictly apply to nodes? A way can straddle a border, therefore a route relation can also. Ways and route relations can have "name" and "ref" tags, which are issued by a certain authority, i.e.are within a certain namespace. So if a way o

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

2010-12-31 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Colin Smale wrote: > In the case of the name/ref, these tags could be further specified by the > addition of some kind of indication of the issuing authority. Two adjoining > authorities may have identically named/numbered entities and explicit > disambiguation cou

Re: [Tagging] Airport subtypes

2010-12-31 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2010-12-30 23:43, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: A recent import has highlighted the lack of suitable subtypes of airport in the tagging schema. There are some pages of lapsed concepts on the wiki of different airport subtypes A scan through the wikipedia gives me international airport domestic airpor

[Tagging] designated bike lane

2010-12-31 Thread Anthony
Any suggestions how to tag this? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:IMG_7491.JPG ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane

2010-12-31 Thread Dave F.
On 31/12/2010 22:27, Anthony wrote: Any suggestions how to tag this? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:IMG_7491.JPG http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle L2? Cheers Dave F. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.

Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane

2010-12-31 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Anthony wrote: > Any suggestions how to tag this? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:IMG_7491.JPG cycleway=lane cycle_hazard=bike lane too narrow or unicycleway=lane (would work better if there were a bike stencil on the lane, since only the back half woul