[Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

Hello, After bringing the tourism=gallery proposal to a long-overdue vote, I'd like to see what people think about the other tags for "arts" (in the broadest sense) venues. Looking around London, where there are thousands of arts venues, we have some fairly confused tagging and a huge number of in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - art gallery

2010/11/5 Tom Chance : > This proposal has been stuck at the RFC stage for years, I want to bring it > to a vote to establish it on the list of map features. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Art_gallery > > Please note: > - This is not for private galleries / art shops: > ht

Re: [Tagging] quarries in engineering

2010/11/6 John Smith : > On 6 November 2010 05:05, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> quarry, or would that be missleading? I know that these are all >> open-cast mines, but the wikipedia entry for quarry seems somehow not >> precise enough when it comes to delimiting the usage. > > The main difference

Re: [Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

2010/11/6 Tom Chance : > Hello, > After bringing the tourism=gallery proposal to a long-overdue vote, I'd like > to see what people think about the other tags for "arts" (in the broadest > sense) venues. Looking around London, where there are thousands of arts > venues, we have some fairly confused

Re: [Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

2010/11/6 Tom Chance : > Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under the > tourism key > Is the current split between amenity / tourism about right? no, it is completly pointless to put a museum, art_gallery, artwork or music_venue in the same category with tags like t

Re: [Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

On 6 November 2010 11:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2010/11/6 Tom Chance : > > > Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under > the > > tourism key > > Is the current split between amenity / tourism about right? > > > no, it is completly pointless to put a museum, art_

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - art gallery

On 6 November 2010 09:42, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2010/11/5 Tom Chance : > > This proposal has been stuck at the RFC stage for years, I want to bring > it > > to a vote to establish it on the list of map features. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Art_gallery > > >

Re: [Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

On Sábado 06 Noviembre 2010 11:39:07 Tom Chance escribió: > On 6 November 2010 11:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2010/11/6 Tom Chance : > > > Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under > > > > the > > > > > tourism key > > > Is the current split between amenity / t

[Tagging] Download huge file via HTTP

Hi I tried to provide a download link to a complete OSM Render Stack in a Virtual Machine on the toolserver. The files are located at /mnt/user-store and symlinked into my public_html. This works for the small files (md5sums) but the 3.1G VMDK File is not accessible: http://toolserver.org/~m

Re: [Tagging] Download huge file via HTTP

Sorry, the mail was intended to toolserver-l Peter Am 06.11.2010 20:17, schrieb Peter Körner: Hi I tried to provide a download link to a complete OSM Render Stack in a Virtual Machine on the toolserver. The files are located at /mnt/user-store and symlinked into my public_html. This works for

Re: [Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

On 06/11/2010 12:39, Tom Chance wrote: I like the idea of a "culture" key. +1 For now, in the absence of that key, we have to decide whether these features sit in amenity or tourism. The wiki makes the distinction by saying that amenities are "important" and tourist features are other inte