On Sábado 06 Noviembre 2010 11:39:07 Tom Chance escribió: > On 6 November 2010 11:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>wrote: > > 2010/11/6 Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net>: > > > Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under > > > > the > > > > > tourism key > > > Is the current split between amenity / tourism about right? > > > > no, it is completly pointless to put a museum, art_gallery, artwork or > > music_venue in the same category with tags like tourism=information. > > The first have nothing more to do with tourism than a subway station > > or a restaurant. > > > > IMHO we should have a new main tag "culture". > > I like the idea of a "culture" key. Would you like to draft a proposal? > > For now, in the absence of that key, we have to decide whether these > features sit in amenity or tourism. The wiki makes the distinction by > saying that amenities are "important" and tourist features are other > interesting things to see. So I think it makes sense for current proposals > like art galleries to sit in tourism, and perhaps in the future to move > those along with theatres, cinemas, nightclubs, etc. under a culture key > if that proposal was voted through. > > Regards, > Tom
No, in general culture is not meant for tourism. Theaters, cinemas and museums are (in the case of museums should be) mainly for locals, so I agree deeply with culture=* Noel er Envite _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
