On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:30:40 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I inform you that I am using informal=yes for ways that are not
> constructed and not maintained or signposted but are only there for
> the fact that someone uses them.
sounds quite reasonable
__
2010/10/27 Dave F. :
> On 26/10/2010 21:42, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> 2010/10/26 Elizabeth Dodd:
>>
>>> The WTO definition is better for mapping purposes. Otherwise I have to
>>> decide if a hotel is used by 'business' guests or 'holiday' guests.
>>> These uses of a hotel do overlap.
>>
>> I
2010/10/26 Noel David Torres Taño :
> On Martes 26 Octubre 2010 22:33:35 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
>> 2010/10/26 Noel David Torres Taño :
> Thanks to both. My problem is this: I have a street in a city, in a pedestrian
> zone, but it is small enough to be unsuitable for cars.
would probably
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:32:14 +0200
Peter Wendorff wrote:
> I don't see any situation, where a stop sign is used as a stop sign
> (and not for decoration) without an intersection near to it.
At a railway level crossing.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> > constructed and not maintained or signposted but are only there for
> > the fact that someone uses them.
>
> > I inform you that I am using informal=yes for ways that are not
> sounds quite reasonable
>
>
>
I'm not sure that's a good ide
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Pieren wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
>
> > > constructed and not maintained or signposted but are only there for
> > > the fact that someone uses them.
> >
> > > I inform you that I am using informal=yes for ways that ar
2010/10/27 Pieren :
> I'm not sure that's a good idea. By doing this, you give the possibility to
> trace almost all possible footways around the world even when it's not
> really a footway, e.g. shortcuts in parks. Or in nature, any track done by
> wild animals will become a footway, informal=yes
I have never seen a stop sign at a railroad crossing. Buses are required by
law to stop before a railroad crossing, and open the bus door so that the
driver can better hear if a train is approaching. Some other commercial
vehicles routinely stop as well, but private vehicles aren't required to
2010/10/27 :
> I have never seen a stop sign at a railroad crossing. Buses are required by
> law to stop before a railroad crossing, and open the bus door so that the
> driver can better hear if a train is approaching. Some other commercial
> vehicles routinely stop as well, but private vehic
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, wrote:
> I have never seen a stop sign at a railroad crossing.
I have. They used to be quite prevalent. Now they're more rare, as
most places have installed active warning devices and gotten rid of
the stop signs.
Unfortunately, I don't remember exactly where
I included rail"way" in my (unmentioned) definition of intersection - as
well as I would include rivers with lifting bridges etc.
regards
Peter
P.S.: Yes, that would have to be worked out in more detail to use it in
practise for generating the semantic connections
Am 27.10.2010 11:12, schrie
2010/10/27 Anthony :
> One proposal for mapping stop signs is that the stop sign always faces
> opposite the nearest intersection.
so let's discuss about this. I don't think it is a good idea to have
implicit facing, I would prefer to - at least in exceptional cases -
be able to define manually
On 10/26/2010 09:17 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Adam Schreiber
> wrote:
>> I think that 4-way and 3-way stops can be handled unambiguously by
>> highway=stop. More complex stops should probably be modeled with turn
>> restrictions.
>>
>> type=restriction
>> res
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> really I don't see the point of this discussion anymore: I already
> question the benefit of tagged stop signs in general, as a stop sign
> itself requires very few seconds of travel time, while a unregulated
> crossing with a lot of tr
14 matches
Mail list logo
