On 06/10/2010 00:12, John Smith wrote:
Someone just added this, it's a good idea on principal, but is this
the best way to tag it?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:highway&oldid=534629&diff=next
The page for the overtaking tag appears to have been in existe
2010/10/5 Vincent Pottier :
> Hi,
>
>
> Nearly a year that the the page
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage has been
> started.
>
> I'm not shure that it has been announced on this list.
>
> They are allready some uses on the excellent tool :
> http://taginfo.openstreetm
2010/10/5 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com :
> I want to say that header files and lists of field names are not
> covered by copyright in general.
> we could fight over textual descriptions, but the list of tages and
> basic information is not seen as a copyright-able information.
> Otherwise you wou
2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham :
> Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
> and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
> the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact the land
> unless acted upon, in which case the land should be tagged
> landu
2010/10/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> 2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham :
>> Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
>> and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
>> the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact the land
>> unless acted upon, in which
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:46 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2010/10/5 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com :
>> I want to say that header files and lists of field names are not
>> covered by copyright in general.
>> we could fight over textual descriptions, but the list of tages and
>> basic informati
The field names in general, the amenity=restaurant thing, that is not
protected,
i am sorry, but you cannot sue someone for copyright infringement if
they copy that. forget it.
It is the name of data structures and it is not a creative work, it is
just a name.
see Baystate Holding: Technical Inte
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> This came into the limelight in NL following a discussion about
> single-carriageway (main) roads with a double white line (i.e. "do not
> cross", effectively "no overtaking") and whether they should be modelled as
> a dual carriageway as you a
I don't like the idea of tagging a dual-carriageway for a way that doesn't
have a physical barrier in between. No passing zones should be tagged in a
manner to denote when passing is or is not permitted by regulation.
Andrew S. J. Sawyer
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:05, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 06
On 06/10/2010 21:05, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
This came into the limelight in NL following a discussion about
single-carriageway (main) roads with a double white line (i.e. "do not
cross", effectively "no overtaking") and whether they should b
On 10/06/2010 06:05 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> This came into the limelight in NL following a discussion about
> single-carriageway (main) roads with a double white line (i.e. "do not
> cross", effectively "no overtaking") and whether they should be modelled
> as a dual carriageway as you are suppos
2010/10/6 Andrew S. J. Sawyer :
> I don't like the idea of tagging a dual-carriageway for a way that doesn't
> have a physical barrier in between. No passing zones should be tagged in a
> manner to denote when passing is or is not permitted by regulation.
While I generally agree with you, I also
On 2010-10-06 at 21:20:08 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> Some places but not all...At least in NL you are not allowed to turn
> left or make a U-turn across a solid centre line, nor are you allowed to
> cross the line to overtake anything at all.
It's the same in Italy, but you can overtake if y
On 07/10/2010 01:03, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
On 2010-10-06 at 21:20:08 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
Some places but not all...At least in NL you are not allowed to turn
left or make a U-turn across a solid centre line, nor are you allowed to
cross the line to overtake anything at all.
It's t
On 2010-10-07 at 08:16:46 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 07/10/2010 01:03, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
>> On 2010-10-06 at 21:20:08 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
>> It's the same in Italy, but you can overtake if you are an ambulance
>> or another emergency vehicle, so I believe it is worth to keep
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
