2010/9/20 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the
> proposal.
I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can
retract down into the road. They're usually controlled by a remote,
and they're often used to prevent non-authorized tra
On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can
> retract down into the road. They're usually controlled by a remote,
> and they're often used to prevent non-authorized traffic from entering
> a road (for example, to reserve it fo
On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can
barrier=bollard
bollard=retractable|removeable|collapsible|flexible
manual=yes/no
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
htt
2010/9/21 John Smith :
> On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo wrote:
>> I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can
>
> barrier=bollard
> bollard=retractable|removeable|collapsible|flexible
> manual=yes/no
Manual? Is this to differentiate between a) on-demand rectratable
On 21 September 2010 18:28, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> Manual? Is this to differentiate between a) on-demand rectratable
Manual as in they usually have a padlock or a built in key slot to
manually retract or remove them, as opposed to some kind of motor
operated mechanism...
___
2010/9/21 John Smith :
> On 21 September 2010 18:28, Simone Saviolo wrote:
>> Manual? Is this to differentiate between a) on-demand rectratable
>
> Manual as in they usually have a padlock or a built in key slot to
> manually retract or remove them, as opposed to some kind of motor
> operated mech
On 21 September 2010 18:40, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> Should we also tag whether it can be remotely activated? Remote owners
> won't need this information (as they already have the remote), but the
> presence of a button or another device would be useful for those who
> don't have the remote.
To be
2010/9/20 John Smith :
> That might cover mazes, but how about the rest of the amusement/theme
> park options?
>
> I'm think someone suggested attraction=maze the other day... In which
> case attraction=castle|dodgem_cars|ferris_wheel|water_slide|wave_pool|
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T
On 21 September 2010 19:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> add your proposals there (or on the discussion pages). Attraction
Done...
> obviously only in case we can agree that this key can also be used in
> parks and other contexts then playgrounds and theme parks.
That page already shows several
2010/9/21 Stephen Hope :
> On 21 September 2010 10:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name ;-)
>
> Wikipedia seems to think they're just a subset of a Jersey Barrier -
> mind you, even jersey barrier is a new term for me. I have
On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote:
On 21 September 2010 10:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name ;-)
Wikipedia seems to think they're just a subset of a Jersey Barrier -
mind you, even jersey barrier is a new term for me.
2010/9/21 Richard Welty :
> On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote:
>>> maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_barrier#Plastic_Jersey_barriers
>
> Wikipedia is a little disjointed on this.
>
> Attenuator is generically used f
On 9/21/10 7:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/21 Richard Welty:
On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote:
maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_barrier#Plastic_Jersey_barriers
Wikipedia is a little disjointed on t
On 21 September 2010 21:25, Richard Welty wrote:
> i'd say jersey_barrier is fine for the concrete, it's a more commonly known
> term than k-rail and nobody will be confused by it.
>
> but i'd use impact attenuator for the plastic sand/water filled barriers.
They may be similar, but one is a barr
On 21/09/2010 01:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/21 John Smith:
On 21 September 2010 09:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes, which tag would you suggest? They are similar to guard rails IMHO
Guard rails usually run parallel with the road, these barriers can be
used to block the road to
2010/9/21 Richard Welty :
> i'd say jersey_barrier is fine for the concrete, it's a more commonly known
> term than k-rail and nobody will be confused by it.
> but i'd use impact attenuator for the plastic sand/water filled barriers.
do we really need 2 different main tags for the same object in
2010/9/21 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> This should be achieved by mapping them where they are (on a way). If
> interrupted e.g. to let pedestrians pass, interrupt the line (way).
to give an actual example:
http://maps.google.it/maps?hl=de&ie=UTF8&ll=41.882023,12.500918&spn=0.003371,0.010568&t=h&z=17&l
Hello,
I would like to start adding the spanish names to the points/ways I enter, but
need further clarification as to the correct way.
Is this how to tag them?;
name:English Name
name:es:Español
Or do I need to do this:
name:English Name
name:es
es:Español
Another question regarding pitch
On 9/21/10 8:06 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/21 Richard Welty:
i'd say jersey_barrier is fine for the concrete, it's a more commonly known
term than k-rail and nobody will be confused by it.
but i'd use impact attenuator for the plastic sand/water filled barriers.
do we really need 2
2010/9/21 Richard Welty :
> i would note that jersey barrier refers to a specific type, which
> has two different slopes, designed to manage the direction
> in which vehicles hitting it go.
that's the one I was aiming at.
> some of the plastic barrier
> systems do look like jersey barrier
inc
2010/9/21 Eric Jarvies :
> or is it?:
> leisure:pitch
> sport:baseball
+1, generally this one.
btw.: What do others use for swimming pools? leisure=pool?
leisure=swimming_pool? leisure=pitch?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
On 9/21/10 8:49 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/21 Eric Jarvies:
or is it?:
leisure:pitch
sport:baseball
+1, generally this one.
btw.: What do others use for swimming pools? leisure=pool?
leisure=swimming_pool? leisure=pitch?
leisure=pitch would be problematic. some swimming pools
are
I've used leisure=swimming_pool. Using just "pool" seems ambiguous, and
using "pitch" (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird.
Brad
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:49 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Eric Jarvies :
> > or is it?:
> > leisure:pitch
> > sport:baseball
>
>
> +1, generally
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
> Is this how to tag them?;
> name:English Name
> name:es:Español
>
> Or do I need to do this:
> name:English Name
> name:es
> es:Español
name=Name in English
name:es=Nombre en Español
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.d
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
>
>> Is this how to tag them?;
>> name:English Name
>> name:es:Español
>>
>> Or do I need to do this:
>> name:English Name
>> name:es
>> es:Español
>
> name=Name in English
> name:es=Nom
Brad Neuhauser (brad.neuhau...@gmail.com) wrote:
I've used leisure=swimming_pool. Using just "pool" seems ambiguous, and
using "pitch" (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird.
Brad
Ditto. Though mapnik doesn't seem to render leisure=swimming_pool,
which is a shame.
--
Charlie
___
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:41:22 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
> >
> >> Is this how to tag them?;
> >> name:English Name
> >> name:es:Español
> >>
> >> Or do I need to do this:
> >> name:Engl
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Eric Jarvies wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
>>
>>> Is this how to tag them?;
>>> name:English Name
>>> name:es:Español
>>>
>>> Or do I need to do this:
>>> name:English Name
David Paleino (da...@debian.org) wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
Is this how to tag them?;
name:English Name
name:es:Español
Or do I need to do this:
name:English Name
name:es
es:Español
name=Name in English
name:es=Nombre en Español
Is that right? I'd assum
2010/9/21 :
> Brad Neuhauser (brad.neuhau...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I've used leisure=swimming_pool. Using just "pool" seems ambiguous, and
>> using "pitch" (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird.
>
> Ditto. Though mapnik doesn't seem to render leisure=swimming_pool, which is
> a shame.
+1
2010/9/21 John Smith :
> On 21 September 2010 19:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> add your proposals there (or on the discussion pages). Attraction
>
> Done...
>
>> obviously only in case we can agree that this key can also be used in
>> parks and other contexts then playgrounds and theme park
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:51:33 +0100,
char...@cferrero.net wrote:
> David Paleino (da...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote:
> >
> >> Is this how to tag them?;
> >> name:English Name
> >> name:es:Español
> >>
> >> Or do I need to do this:
> >> name:Engli
Nashville, Tennessee, USA was hit by a thousand-year flood on May 1st and May
2nd, 2010 (that is, a flood severe enough that is unlikely to occur more than
once in a thousand-year period). One of the consequences was that a small
park, containing a softball field used mostly by children's teams
John,
Here is an approach that I took for a similar situation.
I tagged some buildings that were damaged from Hurricane Ike in Galveston
Texas as "disused=yes" and I place a note saying why. Here is an example of
one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/914783304
I've heard others suggest
On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan wrote:
> I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as
> "amenity=disused".
The only problem with that is it would obscure any amenities that may
have been damaged that they're planning to fix etc, I'd stick with
disused=yes so you know what w
agreed. I prefer disused=yes myself but I wanted to at least mention
another approach I've read.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:45, John Smith wrote:
> On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan wrote:
> > I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as
> > "amenity=disused".
>
> The only
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:45 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan wrote:
>> I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as
>> "amenity=disused".
>
> The only problem with that is it would obscure any amenities that may
> have been damaged that they're plann
37 matches
Mail list logo
