On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> Nathan Edgars II
> wrote:
>
> > > Yes i understand, but own could you figure "flow=downstream" exist ?
> > > You must read a "manual" to know that.
> >
> > By noting its presence on an already-mapped waterway. And if you don't
> > kno
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Pierre-Alain Dorange
> wrote:
>> Yes i understand, but own could you figure "flow=downstream" exist ?
>> You must read a "manual" to know that.
>
> By noting its presence on an already-mapped waterway. And if you don't
> know about it, a
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> One test to apply when considering stuff like this: what would happen
> if a renderer supported "man_made=tower" but none of the sub-tags.
> Would it be the end of the world if a radio mast and an air traffic
> control tower were rendered the
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Sean Horgan wrote:
> > social_facility=emergency_shelter (a shelter for homeless people e.g. in
> > case of a disaster)
>
> The description there looks horribly confusing to me. The words
> "homeless shelter"
yup,
just change 'social_facility:for=homeless'
to
shelter=homess'
this way it's a clear sub-sub-tag
cheers,
sam
On 9/13/10, Sean Horgan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Sean Horgan wrote:
>> > social_facility=emergency_shelt
