On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> No, there are other kinds of designation covered by bicycle=designated.
> :
> cycleway=sharrow
>
>
For me, it's not necessary to create a new tag when bicycle=designated feets
perfectly here. If you really want to distinguish between a ver
Hello,
What would be the best way to tag *dancing schools*?
In Germany they are authorized by the *ADTV* (both links in German)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allgemeiner_Deutscher_Tanzlehrerverband
http://www.tanzen.de/
in Austria they are authorized by the *VTÖ* (in German)
http://www.vtoe.at/
On 08/12/2010 09:00 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
>> bicycle=designated is all a sharrow means in OSM terms.
>
> No, there are other kinds of designation covered by bicycle=designated.
He wasn’t saying that bicycle=designated is always a sharr
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 09:00 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Paul Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> bicycle=designated is all a sharrow means in OSM terms.
>>
>> No, there are other kinds of designation covered by bicycle=designated.
But it's not effectively the same thing. If it were, sharrows
wouldn't have ever been invented.
Now, Steve (and Mike), what's wrong (if anything) with
bicycle=designated; sharrow=yes?
Considering -
bicycle=yes - not useful; generally implied bicycle=yes can be derived
from type of highway
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Mike N. wrote:
> That also raises the question of how to tag differences between opposite
> sides of the road;
> bicycle:left=designated
> bicycle:right=designated
One which I'm not going to touch! I've heard a few competing ideas
for this (for access tags in
