Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:03:33 +1000 schrieb Steve Bennett:
> These were pretty big in Australia too, maybe in the 80s and early
> 90s. I don't see many new ones being created.
Then go out and map it! ;)
>> The stations are always quite simple structures, e.g. a post to strech your
>> muscles, wood
Am Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:59:19 +0200 schrieb Elena of Valhalla:
> Anyway, there are motorway tunnels like the Gotthard one that have
> just one shaft and one lane per direction, but they are few exceptions
> and can be easily tagged oneway=no.
JFTR: The Gotthard-Tunnel is a trunk, not a motorway.
R
I'm no expert but wouldn't there be some official definition between sizes?
This is what I found on a quick search:
http://www.answers.com/topic/airport-classification
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.opens
2010/6/14 John Smith :
> +1 maybe power=station should be the power stations and instead of
> using sub-station just use power=transformer...
Good idea. However for me, as non native English speaker,
power=generator is also obvious.
___
Tagging mailing
On 15 June 2010 05:31, y...@o2.pl wrote:
> 2010/6/14 John Smith :
>> +1 maybe power=station should be the power stations and instead of
>> using sub-station just use power=transformer...
>
> Good idea. However for me, as non native English speaker,
> power=generator is also obvious.
In a power s
2010/6/14 John Smith :
> In a power station there could be lots of generators...
Sure, but who knows where they are? ;)
Anyway, I can create a proposal page with 'power' tags update.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openst
On 15 June 2010 06:15, y...@o2.pl wrote:
> 2010/6/14 John Smith :
>> In a power station there could be lots of generators...
>
> Sure, but who knows where they are? ;)
Inside the power station building?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.or
2010/6/14 John Smith :
> Inside the power station building?
In most cases yes, you won't see them at satellite images. That's what
I mean. If you think it's confusing maybe we should also replace this
tag.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.
Hi ,
The education heirarchy goes like this :
University ->College -> School
Where does a institute not bound/affiliated by any university fit in ?
For esample a institue privately run and teaches 'french' or 'c,c++'
etc .
I also have seen that
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_featu
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, John Smith wrote:
> On 15 June 2010 06:15, y...@o2.pl wrote:
> > 2010/6/14 John Smith :
> >> In a power station there could be lots of generators...
> >
> > Sure, but who knows where they are? ;)
>
> Inside the power station building?
>
I've been to see a couple in my lifet
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, John Smith wrote:
> Some of the fitness equipment areas also have sign boards indicating
> how you can use them, playgrounds don't usually come with
> instructions.
Found one at Glenelg in an unmarked park
http://osm.org/go/uFw6q9Jp6-
which is new with outdoor versions of mod
On 15 June 2010 08:01, pavithran wrote:
> Hi ,
> The education heirarchy goes like this :
>
> University ->College -> School
Here university doesn't come after college, you can do either,
colleges usually give you more practical educates especially in
trades.
> Where does a institute not bound/
On 15 June 2010 09:25, Liz wrote:
> I've been to see a couple in my lifetime, most underground as part of
> hydroelectric installations.
> There is not a relationship between the visible building and the position of
> the turbines which generate the power
What about the smoke stacks?
___
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Thomas Ineichen
wrote:
> 'Station' sounds like a big shape.. (Ok, I started using it :) )
Although I just made up the term, "station" can be used in the sense
of one step in a sequence (eg, "stations of the cross", "station in
life")
> Would fitness_post also be
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Zeke Farwell wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> You may or may not know that currently in OSM there is only one [rendered]
> tag to describe the many different types of places where planes can take off
> and land (aeroway=aerodrome). I'm trying to figure out how we can tag t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Liz wrote:
> I've been to see a couple in my lifetime, most underground as part of
> hydroelectric installations.
> There is not a relationship between the visible building and the position of
> the turbines which generate the power
Maybe we could simplify everyth
Thanks for the link, Dave. I've though about similar classification schemes
to what's listed there. Something like this in decreasing importance:
aerodrome = international
aerodrome = regional
aerodrome = local
The problem I see with this terminology is that it's more subjective, and
it's harder
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, pavithran wrote:
> Hi ,
> The education heirarchy goes like this :
>
> University ->College -> School
University is unambiguous.
College means about fifty different things in different schools.
("University" in the US, "part of a university" in UK, "place studen
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> College means about fifty different things in different schools.
err, different countries.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 15 June 2010 13:04, Steve Bennett wrote:
> College means about fifty different things in different schools.
> ("University" in the US, "part of a university" in UK, "place students
> live" in Australia, "secondary school" also in Australia...
The Australia bit, it's usually "residential colleg
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Anthony wrote:
> In any case, I don't think it should be called a motorway if bicycles are
> allowed. I suppose if bicycles are restricted to the shoulder it's arguably
> still a motorway, but still, I think I'd rather see them tagged as
> highway=trunk.
This do
On 15 June 2010 13:02, Zeke Farwell wrote:
> Thanks for the link, Dave. I've though about similar classification schemes
> to what's listed there. Something like this in decreasing importance:
> aerodrome = international
> aerodrome = regional
> aerodrome = local
> The problem I see with this te
Steve,
I like this as a possible solution as well. Perhaps the admin_level tag
could be used? Same as for boundaries. The challenges in my eyes are not
making the tagging scheme overly complicated, and making if verifiable based
on physical characteristics. In my opinion OSM only needs three l
Also, how would you tag facilities that have one or more helipads (landing pads
for helicopters), but no runways for fixed-wing aircraft?
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexand
On 15 June 2010 13:40, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Also, how would you tag facilities that have one or more helipads (landing
> pads for helicopters), but no runways for fixed-wing aircraft?
aerodrome=heliport?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstree
Well aeroway=helipad is documented on the wiki. Doesn't render currently
though. Also I think that's intended to mark each single landing pad. I
think if we can develop a consistent scheme then
aeroway=aerodrome
aerodrome=heliport
would be better for a whole facility. But where does it fit in t
On 15 June 2010 13:33, Zeke Farwell wrote:
> Steve,
> I like this as a possible solution as well. Perhaps the admin_level tag
> could be used? Same as for boundaries. The challenges in my eyes are not
> making the tagging scheme overly complicated, and making if verifiable based
> on physical c
What about this example
62.06, -7.27 (sorry cant get the link, openstreetmap.org is down)
it is in Faroe Islands, we only have 1 small airport/aerodrome with 1 short
runway (1250m) with few small buildings in the hole country
From: Zeke Farwell
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:33 AM
To: Tag dis
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Secondly...I really can't see how the presence or absence of bicycle
> restrictions changes the status of the road at all. In my area, some
> freeways allow bicycles, some don't. It would be completely incorrect
> to presume that those that don't are "mor
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, John Smith wrote:
> I think we would be better classifying things based on approximate air
> traffic per day, the number of run ways, and so no, alternatively we
> could just tag these things individually:
>
> air_traffic=1000
> runways=10
as i recall, Cloncurry actually has 7
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 15 June 2010 13:33, Zeke Farwell wrote:
>> Steve,
>> I like this as a possible solution as well. Perhaps the admin_level tag
>> could be used? Same as for boundaries. The challenges in my eyes are not
>> making the tagging scheme overly c
On 15 June 2010 16:05, Steve Bennett wrote:
> While 3 levels might be enough currently, it might also be better to
> leave room for more levels. Perhaps make it a scale out of 10, with
> only numbers 3, 5 and 7 used at the moment.
Numbers can be just as bad, what does 10 mean? is 1 the highest or
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Liz wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, John Smith wrote:
> > I think we would be better classifying things based on approximate air
> > traffic per day, the number of run ways, and so no, alternatively we
> > could just tag these things individually:
> >
> > air_traffic=1000
> > ru
33 matches
Mail list logo
