Re: [Tagging] Cable distribution cabinet

2010-06-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/6/8 John Smith : > power=sub_station > voltage:from=330kV > voltage:to=100kV following recent discussions on Talk-DE, this would be power=station, while the power station (generating station) itself is called power=generator. At least that's what they wrote. > or in this case > > voltage:to

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/6/7 Roy Wallace : > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > Martin, I don't really know what you mean. Perhaps I don't understand > the type=area proposal properly. Can you give us a full example (i.e. > the tags) of how you would map those curved steps? actually th

[Tagging] differences on wiki about roles of relation route.

2010-06-08 Thread fly
Hi There exists major differences on wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route between german and english. All the roles with ...:number are striped out on the german page. There is no role link on the german page. The definition in german for forward/backward say you should use it for the dir

Re: [Tagging] differences on wiki about roles of relation route.

2010-06-08 Thread Richard Mann
the :number roles are obsolete (you should order the relation members instead - probably using JOSM) The English definition of the forward/backward roles is correct. If the relation is one-way, and the direction of the way is the same, then use "forward". If the direction of the way is opposite, u

Re: [Tagging] differences on wiki about roles of relation route.

2010-06-08 Thread Andre Engels
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, fly wrote: > There exists major differences on wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route > between german and english. > > All the roles with ...:number are striped out on the german page. > > There is no role link on the german page. > > The definition in german

Re: [Tagging] differences on wiki about roles of relation route.

2010-06-08 Thread fly
Am 08.06.2010 12:57, schrieb Andre Engels: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, fly wrote: > >> There exists major differences on wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route >> between german and english. >> >> All the roles with ...:number are striped out on the german page. >> >> There is no role

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread fly
Interesting relation. We need some examples as data to have a look at. Maybe also a rendered example would be nice. I gonna try it with some stair these days. I still wonder if the render-software will be able to reduces the steps by itself. I have a stairway with 12 steps on the left and 7 steps

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/6/8 fly : > Interesting relation. thanks, it is capable to model a lot more (lanes, road surface without explicit "inner" borders, detailed barriers with less effort, ...), but unfortunately I'm not a programmer to prove it could work. > We need some examples as data to have a look at. May

Re: [Tagging] differences on wiki about roles of relation route.

2010-06-08 Thread Andre Engels
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:48 PM, fly wrote: > Anyway there is a forward_stop/backward_stop which differs in its meaning to > forward:stop/backward:stop that way. I'd say there it is the English explanation which is obviously the correct one: The way will always have a defined direction, the relat

Re: [Tagging] religion

2010-06-08 Thread Dave F.
John Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2010 18:04, Simone Saviolo wrote: > >> Would you tag the Parthenon as religion=ancient_greek or something >> like that? IMHO, the religion tag should only be used for what is >> actively used for religious ceremonies. >> > > The Parthenon isn't a good example,

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread Roy Wallace
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > actually this is not yet incorporated in the area proposal, that's why > you might be confused, but it could be done with it. So just to summarise, you would have a relation: type=area highway=steps step_count=15 (already documented o

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/6/9 Roy Wallace : > So just to summarise, you would have a relation: > type=area > highway=steps > step_count=15 (already documented on the wiki) > > with way members: > role=lower, > role=upper, and two > role=lateral (I don't think these values need to be prefixed with steps:) that's fine,

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging "wide" steps (tribune / terrace)

2010-06-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/6/9 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 0 for the lowest way > 1 is at higher elevation than 0 > 2 > 3 sorry, forget about this, it makes things too complicated. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/

Re: [Tagging] Cable distribution cabinet

2010-06-08 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:59 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > following recent discussions on Talk-DE, this would be power=station, > while the power station (generating station) itself is called > power=generator. At least that's what they wrote. > > This would be the sub_station according to that