Your considered vote on this proposal would be appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/covered
--
Randy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
From recent discussions on the talk-dk list, it seems that all
mappers who have spoken out agree that the current scheme for tagging
cycleways [0] is not adequate for conditions in Denmark.
The currently available values on the cycleway key are: lane and track
(apart from the opposite*
On 05/12/2009, at 4:14 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I guess it is implied that when you are not allowed to carry a bike
> you are not allowed to ride it neither.
>
> True, but when I tag bicycle=no, I don't intend to imply anything about
> wheth
2009/12/6 James Livingston :
> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
> bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
> example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't walk your
> horse as well as not riding it. So ma
On 06/12/2009, at 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/6 James Livingston :
>> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
>> bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
>> example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't
